Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19807PUBLISHED: 2019-12-15
In the Linux kernel before 5.3.11, sound/core/timer.c has a use-after-free caused by erroneous code refactoring, aka CID-e7af6307a8a5. This is related to snd_timer_open and snd_timer_close_locked. The timeri variable was originally intended to be for a newly created timer instance, but was used for ...
CVE-2014-8650PUBLISHED: 2019-12-15python-requests-Kerberos through 0.5 does not handle mutual authentication
CVE-2014-3536PUBLISHED: 2019-12-15CFME (CloudForms Management Engine) 5: RHN account information is logged to top_output.log during registration
CVE-2014-3643PUBLISHED: 2019-12-15jersey: XXE via parameter entities not disabled by the jersey SAX parser
CVE-2014-3652PUBLISHED: 2019-12-15JBoss KeyCloak: Open redirect vulnerability via failure to validate the redirect URL.
User Rank: Ninja
5/17/2013 | 6:24:22 PM
background preferably in Linux would be my first pick. Why? Most
firewalls, IPSGÇÖs and SPAM engines for instance usually run on some form
of Linux, if not some sort of proprietary OS or firmware under the
covers."
I Totally disagree with that, because, it leads me to believe that you have a Linux background and supposedly only people with Linux backgrounds can do anything, however Linux is NOT the end-all-be-all. I think that the best security personnel do come from the network\sysadmin (Linux, Novell or Microsoft) professions, the problem is getting them to stop thinking like an admin and look at the picture from the point of view of "...is it secure secure or not..." versus "...why isn't it secure or not...", and teach them how to understand the need for policy and why it's important to security, because in almost every case we know why something is not secure, (and network\sysadmins seem to take policy very personal). Also, these converts need to get tougher skin, and understand that when you're the bearer of not so good news nobody ever likes you.