Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operational Security

1/3/2018
08:55 AM
Simon Marshall
Simon Marshall
Simon Marshall
50%
50%

Cyber Insurance Builds for Business

Insurance for cyber issues is growing to take its place with property, casualty and business continuity insurance for the enterprise.

If a data center is flooded by rain, would you claim on your facility or your cyber insurance? Does a self-driving vehicle need insurance for humans, or is the insurer really just underwriting an algorithm?

How does a company adequately insure their staff against negligent loss of data, or exposing it to hackers through insufficient security protection?

These questions show just how complex the embryonic cyber insurance market can be. Some enterprises have explored coverage as a bulwark against financial loss from security attacks, but many of them need to accept it's not an "if" but a "when" scenario. However, the immaturity of the market and the complexity of modeling cyber risk make it a difficult requirement to navigate.

Allied Market Research has forecast that the cyber insurance market will be worth $14 billion by 2022. According to the Association of British Insurers, most cyber insurance policies have three common features, covering business interruption loss, privacy breach costs and forensic incident response.

"Business interruption might be the simplest [to insure] here, but there isn't a good catch-all answer for the cyber market, as it largely depends on the company or industry -- for example, whether you are big, small, have multiple locations or a complex network architecture," Matthew Honea, cyber director at Cyence, a San Mateo-based firm that quantifies the financial impact of cyber risk, told Security Now.

Insuring complex risks
Cyber risks are highly complicated to insure because the nature of the security threat is constantly evolving and mutating. On one side, enterprises have varying security measures in place and each company has a different attack surface. On the other, hackers constantly change targets, attack vectors, malware and payloads. With so many potential variables, it's a challenge for insurers to assess risk and therefore the current focus is on at least having some of the bases covered.

"While hackers do migrate to more complex attack techniques, strategies and ways to extract information, many fundamental concepts stay the same," said Honea. "Breaches start from either a technical process or a human process that was exploited, and that's what the [insurance] product focuses on. That being said, we also find ways to incorporate new and unprecedented macro factors, such as zero-day exploits being released publicly."

As a basic example of how risk modeling works, let's assume that a company has an FTP server that needs decommissioning. It will take time to move through the process and so the server needs to stay online throughout, until every step has been completed.

"Attackers like to target file servers because of the sensitive data that can be stored on them," said Honea. "The company will need to evaluate the cost of a breach on that server versus the cost to monitor the accounts, restrict access and upgrade the system."

Some traditional insurers are questioning whether it's a market they even want to pursue. A recent PWC report showed a 50/50 cyber insurance market split polarized by insurers that on one hand see this as an opportunity for business growth, and on the other, organizations that refuse to offer insurance for fear that it is effectively uninsurable.

Nevertheless, there are notable examples from 2017 that clearly point to the need for insurance.

"This year's WannaCry attack, which hit at least 150 countries, is a good example of a cyber incident that could have used cyber insurance for financial recovery, as Cyence estimated the potential costs from the hack at $8 billion," said Honea. "Another is AWS's four-hour outage in February, which (we) estimated lost S&P 500 companies $150 million."

2018 predictions
As we're on the cusp of 2018, here is what Honea expects we will be seeing. Companies will get smarter about how they allocate and spend budget on security protection.
"For example, we expect to see more security budgets include a portion dedicated to cyber insurance to help mitigate uncharted risks or identified risks where technology may not help," said Honea. "Furthermore, we'll start to see insurance leveraged as a way to bridge the gap that technology vendors leave, as cybersecurity solutions can't 100% guarantee protection." Malware will seek higher ransom rewards.
"With crypto-ransomware, attackers will focus on reaching the highest value systems that can cripple an entire company -- rather than targeting everyone and anyone -- until the ransom is met," said Honea. "This can readily lead to losses in reputation, revenue and business interruption for victim companies." Insurers will begin to grapple with cyber insurance for self-driving and autonomous vehicles.
"We'll begin to see insurers take a close look at how they should be covering auto in this new autonomous setting, including what types of data they can factor since historical demographics, like age group, won't be applicable," said Honea.

Related posts:

— Simon Marshall, Technology Journalist, special to Security Now

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Manchester United Suffers Cyberattack
Dark Reading Staff 11/23/2020
As 'Anywhere Work' Evolves, Security Will Be Key Challenge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/23/2020
Cloud Security Startup Lightspin Emerges From Stealth
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  11/24/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-20934
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-28
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 5.2.6. On NUMA systems, the Linux fair scheduler has a use-after-free in show_numa_stats() because NUMA fault statistics are inappropriately freed, aka CID-16d51a590a8c.
CVE-2020-29368
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-28
An issue was discovered in __split_huge_pmd in mm/huge_memory.c in the Linux kernel before 5.7.5. The copy-on-write implementation can grant unintended write access because of a race condition in a THP mapcount check, aka CID-c444eb564fb1.
CVE-2020-29369
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-28
An issue was discovered in mm/mmap.c in the Linux kernel before 5.7.11. There is a race condition between certain expand functions (expand_downwards and expand_upwards) and page-table free operations from an munmap call, aka CID-246c320a8cfe.
CVE-2020-29370
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-28
An issue was discovered in kmem_cache_alloc_bulk in mm/slub.c in the Linux kernel before 5.5.11. The slowpath lacks the required TID increment, aka CID-fd4d9c7d0c71.
CVE-2020-29371
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-28
An issue was discovered in romfs_dev_read in fs/romfs/storage.c in the Linux kernel before 5.8.4. Uninitialized memory leaks to userspace, aka CID-bcf85fcedfdd.