theDocumentId => 748579 Marriott Revises Data Breach Numbers as ...

Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operational Security //

Data Leakage

1/4/2019
02:30 PM
Scott Ferguson
Scott Ferguson
News Analysis-Security Now
50%
50%

Marriott Revises Data Breach Numbers as Investigation Continues

Marriott has revised the number of customer accounts it believes were affected during a massive data breach. While the overall number dropped, the company now believes 5 million unencrypted passport numbers were exposed.

Marriott is still coming to grips with a massive data breach that affected millions of the company's Starwood customers, and the company is now offering further details on what records have been exposed.

First, the good news: In a January 4 release, the company stated it now believes that instead of the original 500 million accounts compromised during the breach, there were actually fewer than 383 million Starwood customer accounts involved.

Marriott also notes: "This does not, however, mean that information about 383 million unique guests was involved, as in many instances, there appear to be multiple records for the same guest."

(Source: iStock)
(Source: iStock)

The compromised data includes guests' mailing addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, passport numbers, Starwood Preferred Guest ("SPG") account information, dates of birth, genders, arrival and departure information, reservation dates and communication preferences. The entire incident remains under investigation by Marriott, several security firms and law enforcement, and how exactly the breach happened remains a mystery.

Still, the update included some bleak news. Specifically, the hotel chain did find that 5.25 million unencrypted passport numbers were stolen during the breach, and that whoever was behind the attack also accessed about 20.3 million encrypted passport numbers, as well. Marriott believes that the master key to decrypt those numbers remained secured.

Finally, the company is estimating that 8.6 million encrypted card payments were compromised, although 354,000 payment cards had expired by September 2018. While these cards appeared to have been secured, Marriott is trying to assess whether the 15- or 16-digit numbers were entered into different data fields within its systems and possibly unencrypted or compromised.

While the Marriott data breach appears to have occurred in 2014, the company's IT team only discovered the event in September, when a security tool noticed an anomaly within the network. After a two-month investigation, the company announced the breach and began alerting customers in November. (See Marriott: 500 Million Guest Records Compromised in Data Breach.)

Later, a New York Times report found that Chinese cyber spies are suspected of orchestrating the breach, specifically to gain access to passport numbers that were stored within the company's databases in order to help build profiles of certain US citizens. (See China Suspected of Massive Marriott Data Breach Report.)

Marriott bought the Starwood hotel chain, which includes Westin, Sheraton, The Luxury Collection, Four Points by Sheraton, W Hotels, St. Regis, Le Méridien, Aloft, Element, Tribute Portfolio and Design Hotels, as well as timeshare properties, in 2015. A separate security breach was reported a few days after the sale. (See Marriott's Due Diligence Failure Led to Massive Data Breach.)

As part of Friday's announcement, Marriott noted that it has now phased out the Starwood reservations database, and all guest reservations are now booked through the company's main network.

The company continues to have a dedicated website for customers who need information and want to ask questions, and Marriott is also offering credit monitoring for guests who were affected.

Related posts:

— Scott Ferguson is the managing editor of Light Reading and the editor of Security Now. Follow him on Twitter @sferguson_LR.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-32686
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-23
PJSIP is a free and open source multimedia communication library written in C language implementing standard based protocols such as SIP, SDP, RTP, STUN, TURN, and ICE. In PJSIP before version 2.11.1, there are a couple of issues found in the SSL socket. First, a race condition between callback and ...
CVE-2021-32783
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-23
Contour is a Kubernetes ingress controller using Envoy proxy. In Contour before version 1.17.1 a specially crafted ExternalName type Service may be used to access Envoy's admin interface, which Contour normally prevents from access outside the Envoy container. This can be used to shut down Envoy rem...
CVE-2021-3169
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-23
An issue in Jumpserver 2.6.2 and below allows attackers to create a connection token through an API which does not have access control and use it to access sensitive assets.
CVE-2020-20741
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-23
Incorrect Access Control in Beckhoff Automation GmbH & Co. KG CX9020 with firmware version CX9020_CB3011_WEC7_HPS_v602_TC31_B4016.6 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via the "CE Remote Display Tool" as it does not close the incoming connection on the Windows CE side if t...
CVE-2021-25808
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-23
A code injection vulnerability in backup/plugin.php of Bludit 3.13.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted ZIP file.