Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operational Security

8/23/2017
01:06 PM
Curtis Franklin
Curtis Franklin
Curt Franklin
50%
50%

Delaware Requires Data Security in New Law

Delaware has become the latest state requiring companies to protect private data.

Delaware has become the latest state to enact legislation on computer security, joining at least 13 other states in setting specific requirements for companies doing business within their borders. Delaware's law is notable in two regards, the first involving the nature of Delaware and the second a critical provision within the law itself.

The bill itself requires that "...any person who conducts business in Delaware and maintains personal information must safeguard that information." It goes on to define what "breach" means and prescribes certain actions to be taken if private information -- like a Social Security number -- is disclosed.

The interesting provision within the law is that it defines "encryption" and then carves out a safe-harbor provision for companies that suffer a breach if the information exposed is encrypted. This safe harbor for encrypted data is likely to have a significant impact on the increase in enterprise encryption because of Delaware's status as a favored state for business incorporation in the US.


You're invited to attend Light Reading's 11th annual Future of Cable Business Services event. Join us in New York on November 30 for the premier independent conference focusing on the cable industry's continuing efforts in the commercial services market – all cable operators and other communications service providers get in free.

As of 2014, more than two thirds of the companies in the Fortune 500 are incorporated in Delaware. This means that at least two thirds of the United States' largest companies must now look at how they will respond in case of a data breach and whether greater encryption deployment for customer and employee records will be a worthwhile investment in order to provide a safe harbor.

States that have enacted data security laws for private entities have done so in a wide variety of ways, ranging from broad statements about providing reasonable protection for private information to very prescriptive laws dealing with the nature of protection and requirements for disclosure.

With Delaware joining the data protection and security fold, eyes will be on many more states in the upcoming legislative season to see whether the number of governments requiring specific data security steps will grow.

Related posts:

— Curtis Franklin is the editor of SecurityNow.com. Follow him on Twitter @kg4gwa.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Manchester United Suffers Cyberattack
Dark Reading Staff 11/23/2020
As 'Anywhere Work' Evolves, Security Will Be Key Challenge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/23/2020
Cloud Security Startup Lightspin Emerges From Stealth
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  11/24/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-20934
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-28
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 5.2.6. On NUMA systems, the Linux fair scheduler has a use-after-free in show_numa_stats() because NUMA fault statistics are inappropriately freed, aka CID-16d51a590a8c.
CVE-2020-29368
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-28
An issue was discovered in __split_huge_pmd in mm/huge_memory.c in the Linux kernel before 5.7.5. The copy-on-write implementation can grant unintended write access because of a race condition in a THP mapcount check, aka CID-c444eb564fb1.
CVE-2020-29369
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-28
An issue was discovered in mm/mmap.c in the Linux kernel before 5.7.11. There is a race condition between certain expand functions (expand_downwards and expand_upwards) and page-table free operations from an munmap call, aka CID-246c320a8cfe.
CVE-2020-29370
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-28
An issue was discovered in kmem_cache_alloc_bulk in mm/slub.c in the Linux kernel before 5.5.11. The slowpath lacks the required TID increment, aka CID-fd4d9c7d0c71.
CVE-2020-29371
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-28
An issue was discovered in romfs_dev_read in fs/romfs/storage.c in the Linux kernel before 5.8.4. Uninitialized memory leaks to userspace, aka CID-bcf85fcedfdd.