Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Operational Security

8/23/2017
06:16 PM
Curtis Franklin
Curtis Franklin
Curt Franklin
50%
50%

DoJ Narrows Scope of DreamHost Warrant

The Department of Justice has scaled back the demands of a search warrant served to web hosting provider DreamHost.

When most IT managers think about cybersecurity, they're thinking about keeping their company's data safe from criminals and cyber-warfare opponents. Some service providers, most recently DreamHost, have expanded that list of adversaries to include the US Department of Justice. And on August 22, DreamHost scored a small victory in their most recent battle.

If you haven't been following this particular part of the news, back in July the Department of Justice obtained a federal warrant ordering DreamHost to turn over everything they had regarding www.disruptj20.org, a site hosted on the company's computers. DreamHost declined, stating that to do so would mean giving the DoJ (among other things) the IP address, and therefore a huge hint about the identity, of everyone who had ever visited the site.

Since approximately 1.3 million people had visited the site, and only 239 were arrested in the protest organized by the site, DreamHost stated that this meant the Fourth Amendment rights of approximately 1.3 million people would be violated. According to some legal analysis, DreamHost's objections are unusual since a two-step warrant process is normal.

In this two-step process, the government asks for, and receives, everything possible from a provider, then sorts through the information and throws away everything not specific to the original warrant. DreamHost objected to providing the first step because of the political nature of the site.


Want to learn more about the technology and business opportunities and challenges for the cable industry in the commercial services market? Join Light Reading in New York on November 30 for the 11th annual Future of Cable Business Services event. All cable operators and other service providers get in free.

Yesterday, news broke that the Department of Justice has scaled back its request for information. In a legal brief filed this morning, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, Channing Phillips, wrote, "the Warrant was not intended to be used, and will not be used, to 'identify the political dissidents of the current administration[.]'... Nor will it be used to 'chill... free association and the right of free speech afforded by the Constitution.' "

The brief then goes on to say, "One of those challenges is that some of the evidence -- particularly the full scope of the evidence -- will be hidden from the government's view unless and until the government obtains a court order or search warrant." Translated into English, that means that the government doesn't know precisely what it's looking for until it sees everything you have. While common in cyber-warrants, this is the opposite of the logic used in most physical evidence warrants.

The DoJ said that it didn't realize that, in asking for everything DreamHost had, it would get log files that included IP addresses and has no desire to identify those who simply visited the site. DreamHost, for its part, stated in a blog post that, while it welcomes the DoJ's revisions, it doesn't believe they go far enough. DreamHost promises that it will lay out additional objections and seek further narrowing of the warrant in court proceedings on the morning of Thursday, August 24.

Disclosure: The author is a long-time customer of DreamHost and continues to host websites and email services with the company.

— Curtis Franklin is the editor of SecurityNow.com. Follow him on Twitter @kg4gwa.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Cloud Security Threats for 2021
Or Azarzar, CTO & Co-Founder of Lightspin,  12/3/2020
Why Vulnerable Code Is Shipped Knowingly
Chris Eng, Chief Research Officer, Veracode,  11/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Todays Enterprises
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Todays Enterprises
COVID-19 has created a new IT paradigm in the enterprise and a new level of cybersecurity risk. This report offers a look at how enterprises are assessing and managing cyber-risk under the new normal.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-27772
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in coders/bmp.c. An attacker who submits a crafted file that is processed by ImageMagick could trigger undefined behavior in the form of values outside the range of type `unsigned int`. This would most likely lead to an impact to application availability, but could po...
CVE-2020-27773
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in MagickCore/gem-private.h. An attacker who submits a crafted file that is processed by ImageMagick could trigger undefined behavior in the form of values outside the range of type `unsigned char` or division by zero. This would most likely lead to an impact to appli...
CVE-2020-28950
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
The installer of Kaspersky Anti-Ransomware Tool (KART) prior to KART 4.0 Patch C was vulnerable to a DLL hijacking attack that allowed an attacker to elevate privileges during installation process.
CVE-2020-27774
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in MagickCore/statistic.c. An attacker who submits a crafted file that is processed by ImageMagick could trigger undefined behavior in the form of a too large shift for 64-bit type `ssize_t`. This would most likely lead to an impact to application availability, but co...
CVE-2020-27775
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-04
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in MagickCore/quantum.h. An attacker who submits a crafted file that is processed by ImageMagick could trigger undefined behavior in the form of values outside the range of type unsigned char. This would most likely lead to an impact to application availability, but c...