Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Partner Perspectives  Connecting marketers to our tech communities.
SPONSORED BY
4/4/2017
11:00 AM
Malwarebytes Labs
Malwarebytes Labs
Partner Perspectives
50%
50%

Top 5 Dumbest Cyber Threats That Still Pay Off

Some hackers are fairly predictable in their successful use of really dumb attacks.

The common conception of cyber attacks are kind of like bad weather, ranging from irritating to catastrophic, but always unpredictable. Hackers are simply too sophisticated to draw any reliable judgments about, and we shouldn’t try.

As it turns out, some hackers are fairly predictable in their successful use of really dumb attacks. Here are the top five.

1.  Browser Locker
Browser locker, better known as the fake blue screen of death, spraying gibberish errors at the user and imploring them to call an Indian boiler room to be scammed at an average cost of $500. Some feature tweaks by the major browsers have pushed tech support scammers into more creative iterations, including registry hacks to replace the Windows shell itself with a locker. But the browser locker still exists in bulk and still draws victims.  Some lockers show some ingenuity, like manipulating the browser’s history function, but most are some variation of:

For x in range (a lot) {
  Alert(“You have a virus, please call Scam Number”)
}

2. DDOS Extortion
With DDoS bots for sale, sometimes on the clearnet, denial of service itself is not the most sophisticated of attacks. DDoS extortion is one notch lazier: an attacker will simply send an email to a corporate security staff threatening massive attacks if a bitcoin ransom isn’t paid immediately. Given that the ransom in question has tended to be relatively low, companies in industries requiring continuous uptime have sometimes shrugged their shoulders and paid. If this happens to you, talk to your service provider to work out mitigations. Don’t talk to the attacker.

3. SQL Injection
SQL Injection takes a modicum of technical skills to pull off, from finding the vulnerable site, to executing and safely exfiltrating dumped files or data. So why is this a dumb attack? Because it was first publically discussed in 1998. It was in the OWASP top 10 in 2007 and 2010. It was #1 on the OWASP top 10 in 2013. This is a known, predictable attack with extensive mitigations, so continuing to see it used so frequently is profoundly dumb.

4. Business Email Compromise
Sometimes, bosses are jerks. Sometimes when a boss is a jerk, their subordinates are too frightened to question an order from the boss, regardless of how out of character it might be. Attackers have weaponized this cliché of the business world by posing as the aforementioned jerk boss and demanding that large amounts of money be wired to overseas accounts as soon as possible. This scam, which is not much more complicated than shouting “Give me money!” is called Business Email Compromise and has cost US victims $960,708,616 since 2013.

5. Macro Malware
In the old days, MS Office had macros enabled by default. This made for a great malware delivery vector with malicious attachments that would run all sorts of arbitrary code when opened. Eventually, Microsoft had enough and switched Office macro support to off by default. Criminals have gotten around this restriction by simply asking the user to enable macros and thereby the malicious code. Here’s the technique cropping up in 2014 and here it is again last month.

In summary, a great many cyber threats are not sophisticated nation-state level, well thought out attacks. The bulk, in fact, tend to be the least effort required for success, which sometimes turns out to be not very much effort at all.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
technicalaccademy
50%
50%
technicalaccademy,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/11/2017 | 1:24:34 AM
adode flash support
Thanks for sharing the top 5 cyber threats.
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/6/2020
Ripple20 Threatens Increasingly Connected Medical Devices
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/30/2020
DDoS Attacks Jump 542% from Q4 2019 to Q1 2020
Dark Reading Staff 6/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15564
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-07
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.13.x, allowing Arm guest OS users to cause a hypervisor crash because of a missing alignment check in VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info. The hypercall VCPUOP_register_vcpu_info is used by a guest to register a shared region with the hypervisor. The region will be map...
CVE-2020-15565
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-07
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.13.x, allowing x86 Intel HVM guest OS users to cause a host OS denial of service or possibly gain privileges because of insufficient cache write-back under VT-d. When page tables are shared between IOMMU and CPU, changes to them require flushing of both TLBs....
CVE-2020-15566
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-07
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.13.x, allowing guest OS users to cause a host OS crash because of incorrect error handling in event-channel port allocation. The allocation of an event-channel port may fail for multiple reasons: (1) port is already in use, (2) the memory allocation failed, o...
CVE-2020-15567
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-07
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.13.x, allowing Intel guest OS users to gain privileges or cause a denial of service because of non-atomic modification of a live EPT PTE. When mapping guest EPT (nested paging) tables, Xen would in some circumstances use a series of non-atomic bitfield writes...
CVE-2020-15563
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-07
An issue was discovered in Xen through 4.13.x, allowing x86 HVM guest OS users to cause a hypervisor crash. An inverted conditional in x86 HVM guests' dirty video RAM tracking code allows such guests to make Xen de-reference a pointer guaranteed to point at unmapped space. A malicious or buggy HVM g...