Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


11:00 AM
Connect Directly
E-Mail vvv

How Retro Malware Feeds the New Threat Wave

Old-school exploits used in new ways are placing fresh demands for intel-sharing among infosec pros and their time-tested and next-gen security products.

Last year saw a resurgence of the Zeus Trojan, a faded relic (we thought) from 2007. Whereas Zeus’s modus operandi used to be email spam, its more recent incarnation spreads via phishing emails, Facebook links and MMS messages containing the requisite links to infected websites.

McAfee Labs reported on the rise of “retro-malware” last year, noting that the Koobface worm -- nearly dormant by mid-2012 -- had hit a record number of victims on Facebook, Twitter, and other social networking sites in the first quarter of 2013, more than double the previous high-water mark in 2009.

In recent years, information security professionals have focused on preventing drive-by attacks launched by phishing attacks. However, these attacks have mutated into data-entry phishing attacks that don’t require any malware at all in their first phases. Instead, they employ the typical email with a link that takes recipients to Web pages that look legitimate and request a login. Credentials are collected as they are entered and no malware ever enters the system until the login and password are used in a later stage of the attack.

Palo Alto Networks recently released a report showing how old-school exploit techniques are being used in new ways and in new places. The report focused on common network applications such as FTP, RDP, SSL, NetBIOS, and UDP that are being leveraged as gateways or pivot points to communicate directly with endpoints. The company found that UDP has become the command-and-control channel for botnets as a safe place to “hide in plain sight,” with the ZeroAccess botnet showing up with greatest frequency. The ZeroAccess botnet is vintage, but the use of UDP as secret communications bandwidth is newly minted.

Late last, year, RDP “hacks” were in the news, with Brian Krebs reporting that Makost[dot]net rents access to more than 6,000 poorly configured Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP)-enabled servers following a brute-force attack that yielded a huge crop of weak credentials. This was no hack: The logins and passwords were valid, so the authentication system lets whoever purchased those credentials from the bad guys come right in.

Expanding security searchlight
In the case of RDP hacks, because the login and passwords used to gain access to these remote terminals are valid, no alerts were sent; technically there was no “hack.” But at the point of the exfiltration of sensitive data from endpoints, if these organizations had been watching for anomalous activity on those endpoints, an alarm could have been sounded. The same is true of the old ZeroAccess botnet colonizing the UDP layer. Anomalous endpoint behavior is the hallmark of infiltration, and something for which the information security searchlight must now regularly sweep.

Phishlabs’ research division is reporting this month that Vawtrak, a new version of the Gozi Prinimalka Trojan that first reared its ugly head in the mid-2000s, is widening its attack surface and expanding in complexity.

“Advanced Web injects” represent core functionality in this new configuration of the Trojan, which is taking advantage of the disruption of other major botnets such as Shylock and Spy Eye to gain new prominence in the cybercrime market. While financial institutions were the primary target of Vawtrak in the early days, new targets include online retailers, game portals, social networks, and analytics firms in the United States, United Kingdom, Turkey, Slovakia, and Australia.

We all know that cyber criminals and nation states are frighteningly well organized and actively collaborating to take down shared targets in mutually beneficial ways. The best way to add defense-in-breadth to our defense-in-depth techniques is to actively share threat intelligence among ourselves, as professionals, and between our time-tested and next-generation security products.

If we can record “normal” activity over time, regularly monitor that activity, and devote analyst time to proactively study anomalous behavior in all the new places they’re attempting to hide, we have a better shot at catching threats in all their evolutionary stages.

As the Director of the Security Practice for Guidance Software, Anthony Di Bello is responsible for providing in-depth insight into the advanced threat landscape. Since joining the company in 2005, he has been instrumental in defining the company's suite of security products, ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Sara Peters
Sara Peters,
User Rank: Author
10/6/2014 | 4:34:09 PM
What's old is new
Well cybercrime is rather fashionable these days; why shouldn't it follow the same rules that the fashion/beauty industry does? Do you think that attackers simply wait until we let our guard down, to start using the old stuff we've stopped looking for? The whole "just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water," approach? I'm not entirely certain, though, why that's preferable. I suppose it's cheaper. You don't have to go invest in brand new malware toolkits and such. 
Marilyn Cohodas
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
10/7/2014 | 7:54:32 AM
Re: What's old is new
I like your fashion analogy, @Sara. I'm the last person to comment on fashion trends, but to take it the analogy one step further, whenever a retro style comes back into vogue, there seems to always be some new twist that makes your old garb not quite the right look or feel. So it seems with retro malware. It's familiar but yet new enough that existing antimalware and practices won't be effective...
User Rank: Author
10/13/2014 | 4:31:52 PM
Re: What's old is new
As you suggest @Sara, it's always more cost effective to reuse proven code where possible than to create new code from scratch, using new vulnerabilities or obfuscation techniques to successfully inject such code into the enterprise to your point @Marilyn. The folks creating and selling malware are just as organized and budget conscious as their white hat counterparts, looking to leverage methods which offer the greatest return on investment wherever they can.
Marilyn Cohodas
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
10/13/2014 | 4:41:37 PM
Re: What's old is new
So true, Anthony. Everyone is looking for the best ROI -- good guys and bad guys alike. 
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, when determining the common dimension size of two tensors, TFLite uses a `DCHECK` which is no-op outside of debug compilation modes. Since the function always returns the dimension of the first tensor, malicious attackers can ...
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, a crafted TFLite model can force a node to have as input a tensor backed by a `nullptr` buffer. This can be achieved by changing a buffer index in the flatbuffer serialization to convert a read-only tensor to a read-write one....
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a TFLite saved model uses the same tensor as both input and output of an operator, then, depending on the operator, we can observe a segmentation fault or just memory corruption. We have patched the issue in d58c96946b and ...
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices f...
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, models using segment sum can trigger writes outside of bounds of heap allocated buffers by inserting negative elements in the segment ids tensor. Users having access to `segment_ids_data` can alter `output_index` and then write to outside of `outpu...