Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

5/5/2006
05:03 PM
Mitch Wagner
Mitch Wagner
Commentary
50%
50%

Blue Security Shoots Itself, And Thousands Of Other People, In The Foot

When an outfit called Blue Security launched a service to go after spammers with vigilante justice, any idiot could've foreseen big problems. In fact, an idiot did. It wasn't a tough prediction to make. Vigilante justice is always a bad idea because it often results in innocent people getting hurt. And that's what happened, as a spammer's counterattack against Blue Security brought down thousands of

When an outfit called Blue Security launched a service to go after spammers with vigilante justice, any idiot could've foreseen big problems.

In fact, an idiot did.

It wasn't a tough prediction to make. Vigilante justice is always a bad idea because it often results in innocent people getting hurt. And that's what happened, as a spammer's counterattack against Blue Security brought down thousands of blogs worldwide.Blue Security's business model is to identify spammers and launch denial-of-service attacks against them. E-mail users sign up for the Blue Security service. Every time a Blue Security-protected E-mail account gets a spam message, Blue Security sends an unsubscribe request to the sender's site. Not just one unsubscribe request--they pepper the sender with multiple requests for every single spam message received.

The plan is that eventually the spammers will have to stop sending their spam because every single spam message will result in stepping up the DoS attack on the originating site. (Blue Security denies it's a DoS attack, but of course it is.)

Blue Security's business model is certainly tempting. Spammers are sleazy, low-life thieves, stealing time and computing resources from honest, working people like you and me. Technology is only partly effective at stopping them, and laws like the U.S.'s CAN-SPAM Act are a joke.

Still, vigilante justice isn't the answer, because when victims resort to vigilante justice, innocent people get hurt.

And that's what happened. According to a report from TechWeb.com, a spammer launched a denial-of-service attack against Blue Security's Web site. Blue Security redirected the DNS address for that Web site to Blue Security's blog.

The problem: Blue Security's blog is hosted by a third-party service run by Six Apart, and Blue Security didn't even notify Six Apart, let alone get permission.

The redirected DoS attack against Blue Security brought down Six Apart's popular TypePad and LiveJournal blogging services. That brought down thousands and thousands of blogs around the world (including, by the way, my personal blog).

Blue Security denies it's to blame.

This isn't exactly what I predicted back in July. Back then, I predicted that Blue Security itself would start aiming its DoS attacks against innocent parties whom Blue Security thought, erroneously, were spammers.

What happened here is that innocent parties--Six Apart and its customers--got caught in the crossfire between Blue Security and a spammer. That's another common problem with vigilante justice: Innocent people get stuck in the middle.

Or, as one observer put it: "If my couch is on fire, I don't push it out of my house and into my neighbor's."

Spam is a problem, but Blue Security isn't helping solve the problem. It's only making it worse.

What do you think? Is Blue Security justified in trying to strike back at spammers?

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/6/2020
Russian Cyber Gang 'Cosmic Lynx' Focuses on Email Fraud
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/7/2020
Lessons from COVID-19 Cyberattacks: Where Do We Go Next?
Derek Manky, Chief of Security Insights and Global Threat Alliances, FortiGuard Labs,  7/2/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-3931
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-08
Buffer overflow exists in Geovision Door Access Control device family, an unauthenticated remote attacker can execute arbitrary command.
CVE-2020-15600
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-07
An issue was discovered in CMSUno before 1.6.1. uno.php allows CSRF to change the admin password.
CVE-2020-15599
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-07
Victor CMS through 2019-02-28 allows XSS via the register.php user_firstname or user_lastname field.
CVE-2020-8916
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-07
A memory leak in Openthread's wpantund versions up to commit 0e5d1601febb869f583e944785e5685c6c747be7, when used in an environment where wpanctl is directly interfacing with the control driver (eg: debug environments) can allow an attacker to crash the service (DoS). We recommend updating, or to res...
CVE-2020-12821
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-07
Gossipsub 1.0 does not properly resist invalid message spam, such as an eclipse attack or a sybil attack.