Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

DARPA Shredder Challenge: Who'll Solve $50,000 Puzzle?

Can you use determination and computational power to reassemble 6,068 pieces of paper into a readable document? DARPA hopes so.

Government Innovators
Slideshow: Government Innovators
(clickimage for larger view and for full slideshow)
More than 5,000 teams have signed up to compete in a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency's (DARPA's) shredder challenge, and those that have solved the first two levels of the test have mainly used manual methods to reassemble shredded pieces of paper. Now, the agency says, it will take computational methods to solve the rest.

DARPA introduced the so-called Shredder Challenge last week. The task is to reassemble five shredded documents and $50,000 will go to the winner, which will be judged on the number of problems solved and their degree of difficulty.

The aim of the challenge is to develop ways to reconstruct shredded documents that U.S. soldiers come across to use to gather intelligence information. The Department of Defense (DOD) also wants to try to discern how enemies might be reassembling U.S. documents by crowdsourcing this activity.

The Obama administration has made ample use of crowdsourcing and challenges to help the feds solve technology and other problems, even creating an entire website for agencies to post challenges for people to solve for a range of cash prizes.

[ DARPA is trying a number of unusual tactics. Read DARPA Investigates Storytelling As Security Science. ]

Sixteen teams have solved the first Shredder Challenge puzzle and two have solved the second, mainly by manual means--such as printing, cutting out and sorting by hand the various pieces of the puzzle--and "sheer patience and determination," DARPA Director Regina E. Dugan said in a statement Wednesday.

The first two problems contained 224 and 373 pieces, respectively, and some teams already have used algorithms to separate pieces individually before sorting them, according to DARPA.

The next three get considerably more difficult, however, and if someone were to come up with a computational, automated means for reconstructing shredded documents, they "could find an advantage" for solving them, Dugan said.

To solve puzzle 3, teams must sort through and reassemble 1,115 pieces of paper, while puzzle 4 has 2,340 pieces and puzzle 5 has 6,068 pieces.

Dugan said it will be a combination of using "powerful computation methods with shared tasking and the diverse insights of the crowd" that will decide the winner of the challenge.

The Shredder Challenge website has received close to 4 million hits since Oct. 27, and more than 5,000 teams have registered to participate. The challenge also has inspired a lot of chatter online, as the teams involved are using blogs and a forum on the challenge's website to discuss the challenge and its technical aspects, according to DARPA.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Shredding
50%
50%
Shredding,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/30/2012 | 9:30:31 AM
re: DARPA Shredder Challenge: Who'll Solve $50,000 Puzzle?
This challenge definitely required hard work. The winners did a great job on this. Being a part of the shredding Houston industry, it is amazing news for us to know that they were able to make a software to un-shred documents and important papers. We just hope it doesn't fall in the wrong hands.
Firms Improve Threat Detection but Face Increasingly Disruptive Attacks
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/20/2020
Ransomware Damage Hit $11.5B in 2019
Dark Reading Staff 2/20/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18238
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
Moxa ioLogik 2542-HSPA Series Controllers and IOs, and IOxpress Configuration Utility ioLogik 2500 series firmware, Version 3.0 or lower IOxpress configuration utility, Version 2.3.0 or lower. Sensitive information is stored in configuration files without encryption, which may allow an attacker to a...
CVE-2019-17274
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
NetApp FAS 8300/8700 and AFF A400 Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) firmware versions 13.x prior to 13.1P1 were shipped with a default account enabled that could allow unauthorized arbitrary command execution via local access.
CVE-2019-17275
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
OnCommand Cloud Manager versions prior to 3.8.0 are susceptible to arbitrary code execution by remote attackers.
CVE-2020-3169
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco FXOS Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying Linux operating system with a privilege level of root on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of arguments passed to a spe...
CVE-2020-3170
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
A vulnerability in the NX-API feature of Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an NX-API system process to unexpectedly restart. The vulnerability is due to incorrect validation of the HTTP header of a request that is sent to the NX-API. An attacker could expl...