Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

Google Calls Microsoft Privacy Claims 'Myth'

Microsoft attack ad draws quick retort from Google, as controversy over new privacy policies heats up.

12 Epic Tech Fails of 2011
12 Epic Tech Fails of 2011
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Hours after Microsoft launched an ad campaign slamming Google's privacy changes as invasive, the search giant hit back, calling Microsoft's charges inaccurate and claiming that it, not Redmond, has the best tools for protecting the confidentiality of Internet users' information.

"A number of myths are being spread about Google's approach to privacy," said Betsy Masiello, Google's manager for public policy, in a blog entry Wednesday. "We just wanted to give you the facts."

Masiello called out Microsoft spokesman Frank Shaw's assertion earlier this week that, "The changes Google announced make it harder, not easier, for people to stay in control of their own information." Not so, said Masiello. "Our privacy controls have not changed. Period," she said.

Masiello took particular issue with Shaw's claim that Microsoft's online services like Bing search and Hotmail e-mail offer superior privacy controls compared to Google search and Gmail.

"Our industry-leading Privacy Dashboard, Ads Preference Manager, and data liberation efforts enable you to understand and control the information we collect and how we use it. And we've simplified our privacy policy to make it easier to understand," said Masiello. "Microsoft has no data liberation effort or Dashboard-like hub for users."

[ Google tweaked its social network rules because of user complaints--but some remain frustrated. Read Google+ Name Policy Leaves Users Unsatisfied. ]

Masiello also dismissed as a "myth" Shaw's charge that Google reads its users e-mails in order to generate data for contextual advertising. "No one reads your e-mail but you. Like most major e-mail providers, our computers scan messages to get rid of spam and malware, as well as show ads that are relevant to you," said Masiello.

Her protests didn't stop Microsoft from taking a fresh shot with a new ad Thursday that bears the title "Email Is Important." The ad, which is slated to run in major newspapers, says that "many Gmail users are increasingly concerned about exactly how their private e-mail information might be used for ads." The spot entices Google users to try Hotmail and Office 365 if they're concerned.

The spat began last week, after a Google exec announced the changes in a blog post. "Our new privacy policy makes clear that, if you're signed in, we may combine information you've provided from one service with information from other services," said Alma Whitten, Google's director of privacy, product, and engineering.

"In short, we'll treat you as a single user across all our products, which will mean a simpler, more intuitive Google experience," said Whitten. Google said the changes would go into effect "in just over a month."

Google's plan has caught the attention of key lawmakers. Reps Ed Markey (D-Mass) and Joe Barton (R-Texas) last week asked the Federal Trade Commission to clarify whether the changes would violate an agreement that Google made with the commission last year to better protect user privacy. The lawmakers want a response from the FTC by Feb. 21.

Please join us on Feb. 15 for the InformationWeek & Dark Reading virtual event Clouds, Outsourcing, And Security Services: Making Providers Part of Your IT Security Strategy. When you attend, you will be able to access live and on-demand webcast presentations as well as virtual booths packed with free resources, and you can also be eligible to win great prizes! (Free registration required.)

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Attackers' Costs Increasing as Businesses Focus on Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19037
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-21
ext4_empty_dir in fs/ext4/namei.c in the Linux kernel through 5.3.12 allows a NULL pointer dereference because ext4_read_dirblock(inode,0,DIRENT_HTREE) can be zero.
CVE-2019-19036
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-21
btrfs_root_node in fs/btrfs/ctree.c in the Linux kernel through 5.3.12 allows a NULL pointer dereference because rcu_dereference(root->node) can be zero.
CVE-2019-19039
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-21
__btrfs_free_extent in fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c in the Linux kernel through 5.3.12 calls btrfs_print_leaf in a certain ENOENT case, which allows local users to obtain potentially sensitive information about register values via the dmesg program.
CVE-2019-6852
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
A CWE-200: Information Exposure vulnerability exists in Modicon Controllers (M340 CPUs, M340 communication modules, Premium CPUs, Premium communication modules, Quantum CPUs, Quantum communication modules - see security notification for specific versions), which could cause the disclosure of FTP har...
CVE-2019-6853
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-20
A CWE-79: Failure to Preserve Web Page Structure vulnerability exists in Andover Continuum (models 9680, 5740 and 5720, bCX4040, bCX9640, 9900, 9940, 9924 and 9702) , which could enable a successful Cross-site Scripting (XSS attack) when using the products web server.