Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

9/28/2010
04:24 PM
Jim Rapoza
Jim Rapoza
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Government Puts The Hurt On The Internet

There are a lot of problems that face the Internet and technology today, from major security flaws to increasing infrastructure demands, you name it. But by far the biggest threats are the regular attempts by government and special interests to control the Internet and technology, attempts which would usually end up causing severe damage.

There are a lot of problems that face the Internet and technology today, from major security flaws to increasing infrastructure demands, you name it. But by far the biggest threats are the regular attempts by government and special interests to control the Internet and technology, attempts which would usually end up causing severe damage.The first is yet another proposed bill from a group of Senators, Democrat and Republican (though maybe they should all be called Entertainment Industry Senators), that is designed to limit piracy and file sharing. This bill, called the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA), would give the Justice Department the ability to block access to sites that are deemed to be dedicated to infringing copyright.

Even worse, there's no judicial review, if someone says a site is infringing and the Justice Department agrees, the site gets blocked. And from the bill it looks as if it would be very hard to get off that blocked list once on there.

So maybe you're saying, so what, those sites shouldn't be involved in piracy and infringing copyright. But just what entails infringing copyright? The bill is pretty vague and if we go by things that the entertainment industry has considered tools of piracy, it could be just about anything.

Among the technologies that entertainment heads have accused of existing mainly to abet piracy there's: the VCR, cassette tapes, DVRs, MP3 players, Internet backup services, CD and DVD burners, and even search engines. And what about sites that promote free use rights and attack bills like that one? Maybe they should be added to those block lists as well.

Hopefully this bill will never pass a full vote of Congress but you never know. There are a lot of powerful names attached to it. If it does pass it looks like it has more than a few Constitutional issues but I would hate to have to rely on the courts to stop this idiocy.

Of course Congress isn't the only one trying to break the Internet and take away the rights of users everywhere. The Obama administration has signaled that it is planning to put forward a bill that would essentially force all encrypted Internet services; from email to secure web sites to peer to peer conversations to systems like Blackberry mail; to put in a back door hole to allow law enforcement to tap those communications.

Now some will say that this is needed to fight terrorists and is no different from tapping phone calls. But there are some significant differences.

First off, we aren't talking about a centralized phone network, we're talking about the Internet. Given the decentralized nature of the Internet, we aren't talking about one back door, we're talking about maybe thousands of back doors.

Once you cut a hole in a wall and add a back door, you are instantly less secure. If these holes exist it will only be a matter of time until bad guys can take advantage of them as well. So there goes the whole idea of secure communications on the Internet.

Even worse, once these back doors were put in, the U.S. wouldn't be the only government to insist on access to them. China, Saudi Arabia, Iran, pick your country of choice. They will all have access to these backdoors.

And like most of these efforts, it wouldn't even really work. Sure, some stupid criminals would get caught. But most would be able to easily figure out ways to get around these controls, which means that the main victims of this lessened security would be legitimate users and businesses.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
Ransomware Is Not the Problem
Adam Shostack, Consultant, Entrepreneur, Technologist, Game Designer,  6/9/2021
Edge-DRsplash-11-edge-ask-the-experts
How Can I Test the Security of My Home-Office Employees' Routers?
John Bock, Senior Research Scientist,  6/7/2021
News
New Ransomware Group Claiming Connection to REvil Gang Surfaces
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  6/10/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Zero Trust doesn't have to break your budget!
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-36388
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-17
In CiviCRM before 5.21.3 and 5.22.x through 5.24.x before 5.24.3, users may be able to upload and execute a crafted PHAR archive.
CVE-2020-36389
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-17
In CiviCRM before 5.28.1 and CiviCRM ESR before 5.27.5 ESR, the CKEditor configuration form allows CSRF.
CVE-2021-32575
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-17
HashiCorp Nomad and Nomad Enterprise up to version 1.0.4 bridge networking mode allows ARP spoofing from other bridged tasks on the same node. Fixed in 0.12.12, 1.0.5, and 1.1.0 RC1.
CVE-2021-33557
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-17
An XSS issue was discovered in manage_custom_field_edit_page.php in MantisBT before 2.25.2. Unescaped output of the return parameter allows an attacker to inject code into a hidden input field.
CVE-2021-23396
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-17
All versions of package lutils are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution via the main (merge) function.