Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

IBM Wins Smart Chip Contract

Big Blue's Burlington fab will produce security chips under contract from Infineon Technologies.

IBM has secured a deal to manufacture security smart chips for use in passports, drivers licenses, personal I.D. cards and other sensitive applications.

IBM will manufacture the chips at its fabrication plant in Burlington, Vermont, on behalf of smart chip designer Infineon Technologies.

Officials at Germany-based Infineon said handing off manufacturing to Big Blue's U.S. facilities will allow the chips to be used in American military and security environments.

"Manufacturing at the IBM Trusted Foundry enables us to meet the specific needs of the U.S. government for in-country production from a security certified, high-volume, high-quality source," said Joerg Borchert, VP for Chip Card & Security at Infineon North America, in a statement.

"Our plant in Dresden, Germany, has provided ICs [integrated circuits] for the U.S. ePassport since 2006. We now have a U.S. site that is fully qualified to supply security microcontrollers and related products with the highest levels of security in a production IC today," said Borchert.

IBM and Infineon have been collaborating on smart chip systems since 2007. The chips produced at IBM Burlington will include 130 nanometer embedded Flash technology on Infineon's SLE 78 architecture, which features the company's Integrity Guard security hardware.

"Infineon is committed to providing a trusted supply chain that protects the integrity of every ID program that uses our products," said Infineon Chip Card & Security division president Helmut Gassel, in a statement.

Financial terms of the arrangement were not disclosed. IBM shares were up .54%, to $130, in midday trading on the New York Stock Exchange Wednesday.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
Unreasonable Security Best Practices vs. Good Risk Management
Jack Freund, Director, Risk Science at RiskLens,  11/13/2019
6 Small-Business Password Managers
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  11/8/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18986
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Pimcore before 6.2.2 allow attackers to brute-force (guess) valid usernames by using the 'forgot password' functionality as it returns distinct messages for invalid password and non-existing users.
CVE-2019-18981
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Pimcore before 6.2.2 lacks an Access Denied outcome for a certain scenario of an incorrect recipient ID of a notification.
CVE-2019-18982
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
bundles/AdminBundle/Controller/Admin/EmailController.php in Pimcore before 6.3.0 allows script execution in the Email Log preview window because of the lack of a Content-Security-Policy header.
CVE-2019-18985
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Pimcore before 6.2.2 lacks brute force protection for the 2FA token.
CVE-2019-18928
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Cyrus IMAP 2.5.x before 2.5.14 and 3.x before 3.0.12 allows privilege escalation because an HTTP request may be interpreted in the authentication context of an unrelated previous request that arrived over the same connection.