Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

4/23/2009
11:45 AM
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

InformationWeek Analytics: Endpoint Security And DLP

A smart mix of policies, education, and new technologies like data loss prevention can help IT balance access and protection.

InformationWeek AnalyticsEveryone's talking about the insider threat. But protecting data can't supersede the requirement to give users the access they need to do their jobs--otherwise, soon you'll have neither business data nor employees to worry about.

Striking a balance between access and protection isn't easy, however, judging by our InformationWeek Analytics/DarkReading.com Endpoint Security Survey of 384 business technology pros. In that poll, 43% classify their organizations as "trusting," allowing data to be copied to USB drives or other devices with no restrictions or protective measures.

Still, IT is aware of the need to move from a stance of securing endpoints to assuming that laptops and smartphones will be lost, good employees will go bad, and virtual machines will be compromised. Instead of focusing on endpoints, let fortifications follow the data: Decide what must be protected, find out everywhere it lives, and lock it down against both inside and outside threats, whether via encryption, multi-tiered security suites, or new technologies like data loss prevention.

DLP suites combine network scanning and host-based tools to collect, categorize, and protect corporate intellectual property. These products can maintain an archive of data and documents, along with associated permissions by group, individual, and other policies. They then actively scan internal networks and external connections looking for anomalies. This takes data protection beyond perimeter or endpoint protection--DLP facilitates internal safety checks, allowing "eyes only" data to remain eyes only and minimizing the risk that sensitive data will be viewed by the wrong folks, even in-house.

A successful DLP implementation involves a number of steps:

Identify known content risks. Secure the data you know about, then hunt down a startling number of forgotten, misplaced, or illicit stores.

Analyze network ports and protocols to look for both expected and devious behavior on nonstandard ports.

Create point-in-time content signatures and filter rules, and establish a baseline for sensitive data stores. These will be used to monitor traffic flow and find full sets plus snippets of sensitive data across file types and transmission methods.

Perform content inspection of all traffic using signature and filter rule sets, and set a policy for notification, blocking, and enforcement.

Enable root-cause and historical data analysis; policies and rule sets must be modified as new threats or risks are identified.

Get the full-length Analytics Report at:
datalossprevention.informationweek.com
Leverage your existing IT investments. Ensure that the DLP suite is set up to work with and take advantage of other network analysis tools and perimeter defenses.

Consider a phased approach. "Passive" network-based tools to analyze data traffic can be implemented without affecting endpoints. Agent-based or full client apps can then be incorporated into standard image builds as endpoint policies and rolled out later.

Joe Hernick is an industry analyst and former Fortune 100 IT executive.

chart: ENDPOINT THREATS -- How does your IT or security organization perceive the threat from endpoint security risks?

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
Cyberattacks Are Tailored to Employees ... Why Isn't Security Training?
Tim Sadler, CEO and co-founder of Tessian,  6/17/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Powerful Cybersecurity Skills the Energy Sector Needs Most
Pam Baker, Contributing Writer,  6/22/2021
News
Microsoft Disrupts Large-Scale BEC Campaign Across Web Services
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/15/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-34390
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty TLK contains a vulnerability in the NVIDIA TLK kernel function where a lack of checks allows the exploitation of an integer overflow on the size parameter of the tz_map_shared_mem function.
CVE-2021-34391
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty TLK contains a vulnerability in the NVIDIA TLK kernel�s tz_handle_trusted_app_smc function where a lack of integer overflow checks on the req_off and param_ofs variables leads to memory corruption of critical kernel structures.
CVE-2021-34392
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty TLK contains a vulnerability in the NVIDIA TLK kernel where an integer overflow in the tz_map_shared_mem function can bypass boundary checks, which might lead to denial of service.
CVE-2021-34393
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty contains a vulnerability in TSEC TA which deserializes the incoming messages even though the TSEC TA does not expose any command. This vulnerability might allow an attacker to exploit the deserializer to impact code execution, causing information disclosure.
CVE-2021-34394
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty contains a vulnerability in all TAs whose deserializer does not reject messages with multiple occurrences of the same parameter. The deserialization of untrusted data might allow an attacker to exploit the deserializer to impact code execution.