Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

8/12/2013
06:27 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Spying Trash Cans Banned

Foot-traffic counting scheme spooks London city managers.

9 Android Apps To Improve Security, Privacy
9 Android Apps To Improve Security, Privacy
(click image for larger view)
London officials have demanded that a handful of recycling and waste bins equipped with mobile device tracking technology stop collecting data about the cellphones of pedestrians.

The City of London Corporation, an 800-year-old elected body tasked with making the city attractive to businesses, issued a statement on Monday directing Renew London, a media technology company, to halt its wireless device monitoring project, intended to count foot traffic.

"We have already asked the firm concerned to stop this data collection immediately and we have also taken the issue to the Information Commissioner's Office," said a spokesman for the group in a statement. "Irrespective of what's technically possible, anything that happens like this on the streets needs to be done carefully, with the backing of an informed public."

London incidentally has more than 50,000 closed-circuit TV cameras recording its residents on a daily basis.

[ Learn more about cloud reliability. Read Microsoft Office 365 Reveals Uptime Figures. ]

In June, Renew London, a media startup that installed 100 Internet-connect trash bins with display screens in the city for the 2012 Summer Olympics, turned 12 of its bomb-proof receptacles into wireless data collectors. The purpose of the experimental units, which ingest trash and expel ads, is to obtain analytics data of interest to local businesses.

The firm's "Renew Pods" track the proximity, speed, duration and manufacturer of passing mobile devices using their MAC addresses. Renew touts the data as a tool for corporate clients and retailers that can associate the past behavior of unique devices -- "entry/exit points, dwell times, places of work, places of interest and affinity to other devices" -- with predictive analytics about "likely places to eat, drink [and] personal habits," among other things.

This data is supposed to be anonymous, though numerous studies have demonstrated that anonymous data can often be used to identify individuals. The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology said in 2010 that MAC addresses may be considered personally identifiable information.

Renew CEO Kaveh Memari, who previously described the technology as a way to "cookie the street," dismissed concerns about the technology in a statement released on the company blog.

"[T]he process is very much like a website," Memari explained. "[Y]ou can tell how many hits you have had and how many repeat visitors, but we cannot tell who, or anything personal about any of the visitors on the website. So we couldn't tell, for example, whether we had seen devices or not as we never gathered any personal details."

Memari insists the pilot project is simply "a glorified counter on the street" and promises to consult with privacy groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation as the technology is refined. Given recent revelations about the extent of data gathering by the National Security Agency around the globe, however, Renew may have a hard time overcoming public skepticism about the need for more tracking technology.

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Cara Latham
50%
50%
Cara Latham,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/14/2013 | 9:48:00 PM
re: Spying Trash Cans Banned
I agree. I can opt to allow cookies to track my presence on a website for access to free content. But the option is lacking here.
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Ninja
8/13/2013 | 10:43:22 PM
re: Spying Trash Cans Banned
I'd have no trouble with this if it were opt-in.
Michael Endler
50%
50%
Michael Endler,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/13/2013 | 9:43:58 PM
re: Spying Trash Cans Banned
If using MAC addresses in this fashion isn't copacetic, then let's see...

What if the trash can tracked passersby using an image sensor? CCTVs are basically already everywhere in London, and the right to photograph public places is very clear in the U.S. (though the right to do so at infinite scale might not be). As Lorna said, cameras are already watching everything you do-- especially if you live somewhere like London.

Image sensors that can recognize people and contribute to analytics are getting more and more sophisticated. I've heard about sensors that specifically counts people as they pass, records how long they linger in one place, and so forth. Same aim as this project, but a different method.

I'm curious-- would people think their civil liberties are being violated if image sensors perform this sort of surveillance/ analytics gathering? Or would many people find it just as objectionable as the MAC method?
ChrisMurphy
50%
50%
ChrisMurphy,
User Rank: Strategist
8/13/2013 | 9:18:11 PM
re: Spying Trash Cans Banned
I don't think it's irrational to resist this. What do we get in return for the trash can tracking our movement? We accept surveillance cameras to keep crime and costs down. At a website we accept registration/cookies in exchange for free content. I don't have that kind of relationship with my neighborhood trash cans.
Lorna Garey
50%
50%
Lorna Garey,
User Rank: Ninja
8/13/2013 | 7:26:56 PM
re: Spying Trash Cans Banned
This is simply proof that people are irrational. They have cameras watching their every move!
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/10/2020
Researcher Finds New Office Macro Attacks for MacOS
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  8/7/2020
Healthcare Industry Sees Respite From Attacks in First Half of 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  8/13/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: It's a technique known as breaking out of the sandbox kids.
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-20383
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
ABBYY network license server in ABBYY FineReader 15 before Release 4 (aka 15.0.112.2130) allows escalation of privileges by local users via manipulations involving files and using symbolic links.
CVE-2020-24348
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
njs through 0.4.3, used in NGINX, has an out-of-bounds read in njs_json_stringify_iterator in njs_json.c.
CVE-2020-24349
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
njs through 0.4.3, used in NGINX, allows control-flow hijack in njs_value_property in njs_value.c. NOTE: the vendor considers the issue to be "fluff" in the NGINX use case because there is no remote attack surface.
CVE-2020-7360
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
An Uncontrolled Search Path Element (CWE-427) vulnerability in SmartControl version 4.3.15 and versions released before April 15, 2020 may allow an authenticated user to escalate privileges by placing a specially crafted DLL file in the search path. This issue was fixed in version 1.0.7, which was r...
CVE-2020-24342
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
Lua through 5.4.0 allows a stack redzone cross in luaO_pushvfstring because a protection mechanism wrongly calls luaD_callnoyield twice in a row.