Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

White House Presses For New Cybersecurity Laws

Congress has dragged its feet for years on passing cybersecurity legislation, so the Obama administration is applying pressure.

Top 10 Open Government Websites
Top 10 Open Government Websites
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
The White House is urging Congress to pass President Obama's cybersecurity legislation in 2012 to give officials the authority they need to combat "growing and increasingly sophisticated cyberthreats," according to the leading U.S. cybersecurity official.

White House Cybersecurity Coordinator Howard Schmidt called for legislators to "modernize" outdated laws surrounding cybersecurity by supporting the broad legislative proposal President Obama sent to Congress in May, according to a White House blog post.

"It is our sincere hope that members of Congress will look at the significant amount of public debate that has been occurring on these issues--as well as the work and debate on this issue over the years in the Congress--and continue to work in a bipartisan manner to quickly enact legislation to address the full range of cyber threats facing our nation," Schmidt said.

[ The feds are trying to better understand what is happening in cyberspace. Read FBI Seeks Data-Mining App for Social Media. ]

Indeed, Congress has dragged its feet for years on passing cybersecurity legislation despite the fact that there are numerous bills circulating, some of which call for the same regulations as the White House plan. Congressional leaders had expressed an interest in passing cybersecurity legislation by the end of last year but it did not happen.

Schmidt's urging came a day after President Obama's annual State of the Union address, in which the president mentioned the proposal as a way "to stay one step ahead of our adversaries" by securing cyberspace.

Laws authorizing collaboration with the private sector--which the feds already are engaged in--are a key part of the proposal and should be addressed in whatever Congress passes, Schmidt said.

"Legislation that fails to provide the legislative authorities our professionals need to work with the private sector to ensure the safe and reliable operation of our critical infrastructure networks would not be commensurate with the very real and urgent risks to our nation," he said.

Other aspects of the plan place cybersecurity authority more squarely in the hands of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)--which already has a key role in leading federal cybersecurity efforts--and address data breaches and privacy protections.

Specifically, Obama's legislative proposal clarifies how companies can share information about cyberthreats with the DHS, and allows the agency to help critical infrastructure companies with their cybersecurity needs if the private sector wants assistance.

The DHS also would be responsible for defining risks that controllers of the most critical infrastructure need to mitigate and require them to provide their plans for doing so to the agency.

In terms of data breaches, Obama's legislation includes a national standard for reporting breaches to replace 47 existing state data-breach reporting laws. It also would toughen up minimum punishments for cyber criminals.

The DHS also factors into the privacy-protections built into the White House plan. The department would be required to develop privacy and civil liberties procedures that the Attorney General would oversee and approve, and companies that want to share information with the government would first have to wipe it of any identifying information unrelated to cyber threats.

There has been some opposition to the White House cybersecurity plan. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, for instance, worried that placing cybersecurity requirements on critical infrastructure companies would place an undo regulatory and financial burden on them, among other concerns.

How 10 federal agencies are tapping the power of cloud computing--without compromising security. Also in the new, all-digital InformationWeek Government supplement: To judge the success of the OMB's IT reform efforts, we need concrete numbers on cost savings and returns. Download our Cloud In Action issue of InformationWeek Government now. (Free registration required.)

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Firms Improve Threat Detection but Face Increasingly Disruptive Attacks
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/20/2020
Ransomware Damage Hit $11.5B in 2019
Dark Reading Staff 2/20/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18238
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
Moxa ioLogik 2542-HSPA Series Controllers and IOs, and IOxpress Configuration Utility ioLogik 2500 series firmware, Version 3.0 or lower IOxpress configuration utility, Version 2.3.0 or lower. Sensitive information is stored in configuration files without encryption, which may allow an attacker to a...
CVE-2019-17274
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
NetApp FAS 8300/8700 and AFF A400 Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) firmware versions 13.x prior to 13.1P1 were shipped with a default account enabled that could allow unauthorized arbitrary command execution via local access.
CVE-2019-17275
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
OnCommand Cloud Manager versions prior to 3.8.0 are susceptible to arbitrary code execution by remote attackers.
CVE-2020-3169
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco FXOS Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying Linux operating system with a privilege level of root on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of arguments passed to a spe...
CVE-2020-3170
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-26
A vulnerability in the NX-API feature of Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an NX-API system process to unexpectedly restart. The vulnerability is due to incorrect validation of the HTTP header of a request that is sent to the NX-API. An attacker could expl...