Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


11:15 PM

Choosing Email Security Services? Watch Your Step

New Dark Reading Tech Center report offers advice on what to look for -- and what to avoid -- in third-party services

[Excerpted from "You've Got (Secure) Mail: Using Service Providers To Boost Protection," a new report published today in Dark Reading's Security Services Tech Center.]

When it comes to choosing email security services, there are some basic elements to look for -- and some basic elements to avoid. Let's take a look at each.

First, virtually all of these services run at least one (and usually more than one) traditional signature-based antivirus product. Of course, that's a bit of a misnomer -- no modern AV product operates solely on signatures. Even though traditional AV systems are no longer in vogue and are ultimately playing a losing game, they still do a lot of heavy lifting, providing protection from malicious attachments.

Second, every vendor has some form of IP reputation technology. IP reputation is a mature security measure, though new twists have sprung up around it. Blacklists for bad-acting mail servers have been around for more than a decade, though IP reputation with smarter updates and larger pools of monitored traffic raise the stakes beyond just a simple "Has this host sent spam in the last X hours?" check.

Finally, ever since spam has been a problem, spam-blocking software has been steadily learning how to identify it. Drawing from machine-learning, Bayesian inference, and fuzzy fingerprinting, a wide variety of related algorithms are churning through the massive amount of e-mail sent daily to try and predict what's bad before spam hits your network.

While it's hard to exactly compare the many different methods in use, one thing is certain -- those with the biggest databases have head starts. The better data you feed your engine, the more likely it is to correctly sort the spam from the ham.

Tread carefully if a vendor tries to sell you on e-mail whitelisting techniques. While positive security models do provide stronger defenses and are a much more promising long-term solution to malware than desktop antivirus, they simply do not apply to e-mail.

Think about it: E-mail works for the business because we receive messages from new, different people all the time. While whitelisted applications on a desktop are easily hashed and validated as legitimate, it's impossible to perfectly validate an incoming e-mail as being from the person it claims to be from. Therefore, it will be impossible to implement positive-security models in e-mail. Show any vendor selling that particular brand of snake oil the door.

Encrypting e-mail can mean different things to different vendors, and it's important to know what's being offered. First, forced TLS (transport layer security) encryption is, technically, encryption for e-mail. That said, it encrypts only one mail-server-to-mail-server connection.

The receiving mail server may be simply turning around and sending e-mail elsewhere on an unencrypted link. This feature will be attractive to companies interested in only a perfunctory level of compliance with e-mail encryption requirements. State privacy laws may be a motivator here. After all, once a message leaves your mail server, the thinking goes, it's not your fault if the receiving mail server mishandles the e-mail, right?

Well, only if you don't care about security best practices and defense in depth.

The proper solution -- and one that is increasingly becoming an popular add-on service from many vendors -- is to automatically encrypt the message content or attachment using a standard encryption engine, and rely on some other out-of-band method for transmitting key information.

While this can have a significant impact on usability, it does guarantee that e-mail leaving your organization won't be easily sniffed somewhere along the way.

Be aware, though, that pricing will vary from vendor to vendor. Most offer encryption as an add-on, but comparing plans may be difficult as the price-per seat for the feature may be rolled into a flat rate, or it may be licensed on a per-recipient or per-sender basis.

To download the full report, which includes analysis of secure e-mail services functionality and a discussion of the key differentiators between service offerings, click here.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.


Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/9/2020
4 Security Tips as the July 15 Tax-Day Extension Draws Near
Shane Buckley, President & Chief Operating Officer, Gigamon,  7/10/2020
Russian Cyber Gang 'Cosmic Lynx' Focuses on Email Fraud
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/7/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
Django Two-Factor Authentication before 1.12, stores the user's password in clear text in the user session (base64-encoded). The password is stored in the session when the user submits their username and password, and is removed once they complete authentication by entering a two-factor authenticati...
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
In Bareos Director less than or equal to 16.2.10, 17.2.9, 18.2.8, and 19.2.7, a heap overflow allows a malicious client to corrupt the director's memory via oversized digest strings sent during initialization of a verify job. Disabling verify jobs mitigates the problem. This issue is also patched in...
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
Bareos before version 19.2.8 and earlier allows a malicious client to communicate with the director without knowledge of the shared secret if the director allows client initiated connection and connects to the client itself. The malicious client can replay the Bareos director's cram-md5 challenge to...
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
osquery before version 4.4.0 enables a priviledge escalation vulnerability. If a Window system is configured with a PATH that contains a user-writable directory then a local user may write a zlib1.dll DLL, which osquery will attempt to load. Since osquery runs with elevated privileges this enables l...
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
An exploitable SQL injection vulnerability exists in the Admin Reports functionality of Glacies IceHRM v26.6.0.OS (Commit bb274de1751ffb9d09482fd2538f9950a94c510a) . A specially crafted HTTP request can cause SQL injection. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerabi...