Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

3/25/2010
03:56 PM
Wolfgang Kandek
Wolfgang Kandek
Commentary
50%
50%

How Safari Hacker Finds Bugs

Multiple vulnerabilities in the mainstream browsers and other widely installed software came to light at the CanSecWest conference in Vancouver.

Multiple vulnerabilities in the mainstream browsers and other widely installed software came to light at the CanSecWest conference in Vancouver.At the PWN2OWN contest held at this week's conference by TippingPoint's ZDI, the industry's top security researchers had no problem taking control over the presented target machines. The machines were running fully updated versions of Safari/Mac OS X, IE8/Windows 7, and Firefox 3.6/Windows 7. Most of the researchers said it took them between one or two weeks to find a vulnerability and prepare for the contest to assure that attacks would work reliably.

In a related presentation, Charlie Miller, the winner of the Safari/Mac OS X target machine, gave some insight into the technique he uses to find application vulnerabilities: He has a program feed the target application corrupted data files and logs the instances when the applications crashes. The crashes are then analyzed automatically and triaged for exploitability. This simple, automated mechanism led to the discovery of roughly 100 vulnerabilities in four applications tested -- a negative showing that surprised the researcher. Certainly his technical expertise and experience in the security field help to speed up the process, but it is clear that a talented person with sufficient incentive can master these techniques.

We know that an underground market for vulnerabilities exists where high caliber exploits can fetch six figures. This clearly gives malicious attackers the incentive to invest their time into investigating these common applications.

A defense against these attacks has no single solution, so IT administrators need to involve multiple layers:

  • Accurate map of all machines in the network and a complete inventory of installed software
  • Fast patching for the operating system and included applications, but also for all installed third-party programs
  • Network defenses that have timely and accurate information on attack sites
  • Education activities that show users how to minimize risky behavior
The tools to support IT administrators in these tasks exist. We now need to acknowledge the problem and rise to the challenge.



-- As the CTO for Qualys, Wolfgang Kandek is responsible for product direction and all operational aspects of the QualysGuard platform and its infrastructure. Wolfgang has more than 20 years of experience in developing and managing information systems. His focus has been on Unix-based server architectures and application delivery through the Internet. Wolfgang provides the latest commentary on his blog: laws.qualys.com and also publishes his Patch Tuesday commentary to the QualysGuard channel: www.youtube.com/QualysGuard. He is a frequent source in business and trade media and speaks at industry conferences around the world, most recently at RSA 2010.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Our Endpoint Protection system is a little outdated... 
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-16246
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
Intesync Solismed 3.3sp1 allows Local File Inclusion (LFI), a different vulnerability than CVE-2019-15931. This leads to unauthenticated code execution.
CVE-2019-17358
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
Cacti through 1.2.7 is affected by multiple instances of lib/functions.php unsafe deserialization of user-controlled data to populate arrays. An authenticated attacker could use this to influence object data values and control actions taken by Cacti or potentially cause memory corruption in the PHP ...
CVE-2019-17428
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
An issue was discovered in Intesync Solismed 3.3sp1. An flaw in the encryption implementation exists, allowing for all encrypted data stored within the database to be decrypted.
CVE-2019-18345
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
A reflected XSS issue was discovered in DAViCal through 1.1.8. It echoes the action parameter without encoding. If a user visits an attacker-supplied link, the attacker can view all data the attacked user can view, as well as perform all actions in the name of the user. If the user is an administrat...
CVE-2019-19198
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-12
The Scoutnet Kalender plugin 1.1.0 for WordPress allows XSS.