Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

6/2/2009
10:20 AM
David Maynor
David Maynor
Commentary
50%
50%

Java Trouble Brewing For Apple

Like most computer geeks with the latest toys, I can always find a way to play rather than work. My procrastination tendencies can sometimes lead to troubling results (just ask my girlfriend), so I often give vendors some leeway when it comes to patching vulnerabilities. But some vendors just don't get it.

Like most computer geeks with the latest toys, I can always find a way to play rather than work. My procrastination tendencies can sometimes lead to troubling results (just ask my girlfriend), so I often give vendors some leeway when it comes to patching vulnerabilities. But some vendors just don't get it.Patching vulnerabilities is never as easy as changing a line of code and recompiling. Vendors that integrate open-source projects have an even harder problem because the details of a flaw might be fixed in a source tree long before they are able to bundle a fix and get it into users hands. I call this window between an open-source project fixing a security program and a commercial vendor that deploys the open-source code applying the patch the "window of owning." Basically, you get free bugs if you keep track of what open-source project is patching what and who it affects.

Apple traditionally has a huge "window of owning." A quick look at the number of open-source and third-party apps that go into OS X shows a consistently large opportunity for exploiting OS X users. (While you may be inclined to chalk my thoughts to prior disagreements with Apple, you would be wrong -- and your Mac would remain open to this vulnerability).

A Java vulnerability making recent headlines has given attackers a great chance to use and abuse Mac users worldwide: Landon Fuller published details of a flaw that has long since been fixed in Java, but has yet to be fixed in OS X. The flaw, CVE-2008-5353, was fixed by Sun back in January. This affects OS X users because Apple integrates Java and has yet to make the patch available to its users.

Make no mistake: This bug is trivial to exploit and has a devastating effect. The example Fuller offers on his Website harmlessly uses the "say" command to inform a user that he is vulnerable. This isn't a case of a vulnerability being hyped and not actually dangerous. Because of the design and implementation of Java, many of the security features Apple added to OS X -- like a Non-eXecutable (NX) stack and Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) -- have no effect in stopping this exploit.

An attacker with a bit of knowledge could make your OS X machine download a rootkit, start or stop processes, add users, and steal information. These are attacks Mac users generally think they are immune to.

Last year at Defcon, Rob Graham and I discussed how to set up a spear-phishing site that is the first part of a remote penetration test. Since this OS X vulnerability requires no user interaction, works with Firefox and Safari, and gives access to the file system, it's the perfect exploit to use to get a foothold into a network. The best part is if the site is hosted over SSL, none of the perimeter protection will be able to detect the attack. This exploit is a pen tester's Christmas present.

So what's the solution? You can disable Java, but a lot of applications in the enterprise need Java to work. You could try and not visit any Websites, but the way this vulnerability is manifested in OS X, there are plenty of ways to get to it. The only real solution is Apple releasing a patch, but as of today that patch is a little more than four months behind. At this rate, by the time Apple patches the vulnerability, there will probably be another vulnerability that attackers can take advantage of. Happy surfing!

David Maynor is CTO of Errata Security. Special to Dark Reading

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 5/22/2020
How an Industry Consortium Can Reinvent Security Solution Testing
Henry Harrison, Co-founder & Chief Technology Officer, Garrison,  5/21/2020
10 iOS Security Tips to Lock Down Your iPhone
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  5/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-13458
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-25
An issue was discovered in the Image Resizer plugin before 2.0.9 for Craft CMS. There are CSRF issues with the log-clear controller action.
CVE-2020-13459
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-25
An issue was discovered in the Image Resizer plugin before 2.0.9 for Craft CMS. There is stored XSS in the Bulk Resize action.
CVE-2020-13442
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-25
A Remote code execution vulnerability exists in DEXT5Upload in DEXT5 through 2.7.1402870. An attacker can upload a PHP file via dext5handler.jsp handler because the uploaded file is stored under dext5uploadeddata/.
CVE-2020-5537
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-25
Cybozu Desktop for Windows 2.0.23 to 2.2.40 allows remote code execution via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2020-13438
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-24
ffjpeg through 2020-02-24 has an invalid read in jfif_encode in jfif.c.