Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Endpoint

7/3/2012
04:06 PM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases
50%
50%

PIN Pads Put Millions At Risk, Researchers Say

Payment terminals handled more than 852 million card payments in the U.K. alone in April 2012

Payment terminals, known as PIN Pads, are putting hundreds of millions of consumers worldwide at risk everyday a British IT security company is warning.

Click here for more of Dark Reading's Black Hat articles.

The terminals, which are used by retailers, handled more than 852 million card payments in the UK alone in April 2012 according to the UK Cards Association.

Researchers at MWR InfoSecurity have found that the terminals are not secure and codes can be introduced by malicious smartcards that will then allow criminals to have access not only to a customer’s PIN and PAN (Primary Account Number shown on the front of a plastic card) numbers but also gain access to the merchant’s network.

“Our research shows security of PIN Pads is below that which consumers should expect for transactions of this nature. The security employed in the software is not up to the job for such sensitive transactions, leaving the devices open to many forms of attack”, said Ian Shaw, Managing Director of MWR InfoSecurity.

“As a result of this, a sophisticated attacker may be able to compromise these terminals to the extent that it would be very difficult to identify if they had been breached.”

“Our investigations have shown that the range of vulnerabilities found in these devices, now part of the everyday shopping experience, could compromise consumers’ card details and PIN numbers. It may also leave merchants unprotected and cause serious disruption to their businesses, potentially exposing both of them to serious fraud”, he added.

For example, a customer at a restaurant could pretend to be making a payment with a “Trojan card” but instead has gained access to the payment terminal. From that point onwards, all pin numbers and other card holder information that passes through that terminal can be gathered by the criminal. They can then take advantage of a number of existing communication channels, such as Internet connection –Wireless, Bluetooth, mobile networks– or phone lines to retrieve that information. Alternatively, the criminal could return and insert again the malicious smartcard to collect the recorded data from the payment device.

“Generally, efforts are being directed to securing the PIN Pads physically but the software installed in the terminals remains highly vulnerable. Even the typical consumer smartphone deploys more security features than the technology used in these devices”, said Ian Shaw.

MWR InfoSecurity has been carrying out research on payment terminals that exchange information with this type of card and has found an alarming range of weaknesses shared by vendors of these devices in UK.

The firm has contacted the vendors and has shared their discoveries with them but at the moment is not able to provide any further details in an effort to prevent criminals from taking advantage of the situation.

“We need to work together with the vendors so that the problem is dealt with quickly”, concluded Shaw.

However, MWR believes this is very serious issue and will be highlighting a number of vulnerabilities it has identified and demonstrating its findings at the Black Hat security conference in Las Vegas on July 25th.

MWR InfoSecurity supplies services which support clients in identifying, managing and mitigating their Information Security risks.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Where Businesses Waste Endpoint Security Budgets
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/15/2019
US Mayors Commit to Just Saying No to Ransomware
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/16/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-12815
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-19
An arbitrary file copy vulnerability in mod_copy in ProFTPD up to 1.3.5b allows for remote code execution and information disclosure without authentication, a related issue to CVE-2015-3306.
CVE-2019-13569
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-19
A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the Icegram Email Subscribers & Newsletters plugin through 4.1.7 for WordPress. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability would allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the affected system.
CVE-2019-9228
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-19
** DISPUTED ** An issue was discovered on AudioCodes Mediant 500L-MSBR, 500-MBSR, M800B-MSBR and 800C-MSBR devices with firmware versions F7.20A at least to 7.20A.252.062. The (1) management SSH and (2) management TELNET features allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection slot e...
CVE-2019-12725
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-19
Zeroshell 3.9.0 is prone to a remote command execution vulnerability. Specifically, this issue occurs because the web application mishandles a few HTTP parameters. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this issue by injecting OS commands inside the vulnerable parameters.
CVE-2019-11989
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-19
A security vulnerability in HPE IceWall SSO Agent Option and IceWall MFA (Agent module ) could be exploited remotely to cause a denial of service. The versions and platforms of Agent Option modules that are impacted are as follows: 10.0 for Apache 2.2 on RHEL 5 and 6, 10.0 for Apache 2.4 on RHEL 7, ...