Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

11/20/2009
12:00 PM
Gadi Evron
Gadi Evron
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Scrutinizing The White House Cyberspace Policy Review

A lot was expected of the White House Cyberspace Policy Review, but like in previous cases, disappointment is what we find.

A lot was expected of the White House Cyberspace Policy Review, but like in previous cases, disappointment is what we find.Even so, this is an important document. The fact that the Obama administration has taken the time to perform the review upgrades the importance of cybersecurity in the eyes of other governments. And as was pointed out to me, the 100 documents submitted to the review for making the final report are important on their own, and their content is invaluable.

But what of the final report?

When I saw the much-anticipated policy review was released and downloadable from the White House Website (PDF), I have to admit I was excited. While I did not expect to find any drastic changes proposed -- it is a policy review, after all -- I was still disappointed.

Expecting the document to discuss past failures or specific plans was out of the question, but general ideas as to where the country should go and where funding should follow was what I genuinely believed I would read. My naivete soon became apparent.

The document is a to-do list of vague milestones. It discusses what needs to be done in order for the administration to have an idea about what to do. Why 78 pages? If there is a lot to read, then people might fail to see the lack of actual content.

When I voiced my concerns on the Funsec mailing list asking if I could simply be misunderstanding, a friend who shall remain nameless quickly corrected me. They plan to do quite a bit. In fact, they plan to, tongue-in-cheek:

- Appoint someone - Do more study - Create a priority - Appoint someone else - Form a committee - Advertise - Create ideas that might, someday, become policies - Tell business to get interested in doing this for you - Create a framework to develop an infrastructure of some type - Have a vision

Smart people in high places may respond and say in good tradition: "A lot is happening behind the scenes, you simply don't know of it." That is quite possible. But judging from past experience, seeing is believing.

The Internet has been running on good faith and trust-based relationships for years now, operated by technical folk with no interest in policy, and saved by volunteer fire brigades who don't know how to speak policy. The entire cybersecurity review document can be translated into stalling for time and in college debate tradition, arguing for maintaining the status quo.

Who are we to argue?

Follow Gadi Evron on Twitter: http://twitter.com/gadievron

Gadi Evron is an independent security strategist based in Israel. Special to Dark Reading. Gadi is CEO and founder of Cymmetria, a cyber deception startup and chairman of the Israeli CERT. Previously, he was vice president of cybersecurity strategy for Kaspersky Lab and led PwC's Cyber Security Center of Excellence, located in Israel. He is widely recognized for ... View Full Bio

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/14/2020
Lock-Pickers Face an Uncertain Future Online
Seth Rosenblatt, Contributing Writer,  8/10/2020
Hacking It as a CISO: Advice for Security Leadership
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 New Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities That Could Put Your Enterprise at Risk
In this Dark Reading Tech Digest, we look at the ways security researchers and ethical hackers find critical vulnerabilities and offer insights into how you can fix them before attackers can exploit them.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-17475
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of authentication in the network relays used in MEGVII Koala 2.9.1-c3s allows attackers to grant physical access to anyone by sending packet data to UDP port 5000.
CVE-2020-0255
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2020-10751. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2020-10751. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2020-10751 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-14353
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2017-18270. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2017-18270. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2017-18270 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidenta...
CVE-2020-17464
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none.
CVE-2020-17473
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-14
Lack of mutual authentication in ZKTeco FaceDepot 7B 1.0.213 and ZKBiosecurity Server 1.0.0_20190723 allows an attacker to obtain a long-lasting token by impersonating the server.