Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

4/19/2019
10:00 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Third-Party Cyber-Risk by the Numbers

Recent stats show that the state of third-party cyber risk and vendor risk management remains largely immature at most organizations.
Previous
1 of 8
Next

Image Source: Adobe Stock (BillionPhotos.com)

Image Source: Adobe Stock (BillionPhotos.com)

Make no mistake: Even the most technologically mature organizations are struggling to keep in check the rising force of third-party cyber-risk. Recent high-profile security incidents, such as the Facebook data leak and the ASUS Shadowhammer attack, bring home the fact that third parties can introduce tremendous risk to business operations, data security, and even the technical integrity of products and services.

Data shows that enterprises of all types are still way behind on instituting the governance and technology to wrap their arms around third-party risks, be they in the software supply chain, access governance, or data handling. And, unfortunately, some experts say the industry isn't moving the needle on third-party risk.

"The overall maturity of vendor risk management programs is virtually unchanged in the face of an increasingly challenging external risk and regulatory environment," wrote experts from Protiviti in the company's fifth annual vendor risk management survey.

For this slide show, Dark Reading took a look at data in that report as well as a number of others on third-party cyber-risk to offer insight into the current attitudes around the problem, the scope of access afforded to third parties, and the maturity level of current vendor risk management practices.

 

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 8
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Stop Defending Everything
Kevin Kurzawa, Senior Information Security Auditor,  2/12/2020
Small Business Security: 5 Tips on How and Where to Start
Mike Puglia, Chief Strategy Officer at Kaseya,  2/13/2020
Architectural Analysis IDs 78 Specific Risks in Machine-Learning Systems
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  2/13/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-1811
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-18
GaussDB 200 with version of 6.5.1 have a command injection vulnerability. Due to insufficient input validation, remote attackers with low permissions could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted commands to the affected device. Successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute commands.
CVE-2020-1815
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-18
Huawei NIP6800 versions V500R001C30, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00; Secospace USG6600 and USG9500 versions V500R001C30SPC200, V500R001C30SPC600, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00 have a memory leak vulnerability. The software does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory while parse...
CVE-2020-1816
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-18
Huawei NIP6800 versions V500R001C30, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00; Secospace USG6600 and USG9500 versions V500R001C30SPC200, V500R001C30SPC600, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00 have a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability. Due to improper processing of specific IPSEC packets, remote attacker...
CVE-2020-1830
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-18
Huawei NIP6800 versions V500R001C30, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00; Secospace USG6600 and USG9500 versions V500R001C30SPC200, V500R001C30SPC600, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00 have a vulnerability that a memory management error exists when IPSec Module handing a specific message. This cause...
CVE-2020-1882
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-18
Huawei mobile phones Ever-L29B versions earlier than 10.0.0.180(C185E6R3P3), earlier than 10.0.0.180(C432E6R1P7), earlier than 10.0.0.180(C636E5R2P3); HUAWEI Mate 20 RS versions earlier than 10.0.0.175(C786E70R3P8); HUAWEI Mate 20 X versions earlier than 10.0.0.176(C00E70R2P8); and Honor Magic2 vers...