Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Perimeter

12/5/2011
10:32 AM
Mike Rothman
Mike Rothman
Commentary
50%
50%

Work And Play In Security

As we look toward 2012, it's time to have more fun at work

Security folks tend to be a pretty grumpy lot. The reasons behind that are pretty obvious, since many practitioners get marginalized because security doesn't really contribute to either the top or bottom lines of an organization. I mean, a breach can impact both, but there is no assurance of a breach or any assurance that investment will prevent a breach. So the entire security house of cards is based on the fact that investments are made to stop something that might or might not happen. And we wonder why the clear impact of a compliance fine drives so much investment is security controls nowadays?

It doesn't help that there is no real "win" for a security practitioner. Today the attackers might not achieve their objectives, but there is always tomorrow. What about doing some kind of security awareness? Yeah, most think that's futile as well. Most folks think of security as a burden and behave accordingly. Looking ahead toward 2012, I'm done with predicting. Yeah, things will be worse. Or not. We'll get more budget. Or not. We'll be breached. Or ... OK, that will happen. Given that my crystal ball is not retired, let's think a bit more tangibly. We need to have more fun in 2012.

You know the old saying, "All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy." Guess what? You're Jack. We all are. That's the nature of the job. But that doesn't mean we can't be more active about making our day-to-day existence a little less miserable. Then I read this post on the New School blog positing :The Future of Work is Play." It makes perfect sense. But how does that apply to security, where "play" isn't usually a word you'd associate with the discipline? I can think of a few ways off of the top of my head:

1. Awareness Games: Nobody like security-awareness training. Most folks tune out within the first five to ten minutes, but they check the box and then proceed to get owned at every turn. What if we turned the security awareness into a game? Try a scavenger hunt with prizes for folks who can detect which emails are phishing, or those who don't click on a bad link. OK, it's not Gears of War, but it's not like you can make awareness training less effective. So try to have some fun with it.

2. Friendly Competitions: Most of you have trouble getting developers to code securely. Why not try a contest? Any developer who has no code flagged for security issues each month gets a night out on the town, courtesy of the security team. Or provide a bounty for out-of-the-box thinking during a threat-modeling exercise. Given what it costs you to clean up the mess when crappy, insecure code gets shipped, this would be a good investment.

3. Capture The Flag: You need to be doing incident-response exercises anyway, and we have always been fans of pen tests to keep your folks on their toes. Why not organize a capture the flag exercise on your own networks? OK, there would need to be some rules of engagement (like not taking down the website), but offer up some prizes and create some competition. Folks love competition, and they also like being able to give their teammates a hard time. As long as the razzing is all in good fun, this can again be a cheap way to keep folks engaged.

I'm sure there are a ton of other ideas to add a little more play to our jobs in security. It probably can't get less fun, so what do you have to lose? And you get to watch the reaction of your significant other when you tell him or her you played games all day at work. Sounds like a great idea to me. Happy holidays, y'all, and I'm looking forward to Hacking Off some more in 2012.

Mike Rothman is President of Securosis and author of the Pragmatic CSO. Mike's bold perspectives and irreverent style are invaluable as companies determine effective strategies to grapple with the dynamic security threatscape. Mike specializes in the sexy aspects of security, like protecting networks and endpoints, security management, and ... View Full Bio

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 6/1/2020
Stay-at-Home Orders Coincide With Massive DNS Surge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/27/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "Well I dont run on MacOS, so I need to take extra precautions"
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-13659
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-02
address_space_map in exec.c in QEMU 4.2.0 can trigger a NULL pointer dereference related to BounceBuffer.
CVE-2020-10703
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-02
A NULL pointer dereference was found in the libvirt API responsible introduced in upstream version 3.10.0, and fixed in libvirt 6.0.0, for fetching a storage pool based on its target path. In more detail, this flaw affects storage pools created without a target path such as network-based pools like ...
CVE-2020-10739
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-02
Istio 1.4.x before 1.4.9 and Istio 1.5.x before 1.5.4 contain the following vulnerability when telemetry v2 is enabled: by sending a specially crafted packet, an attacker could trigger a Null Pointer Exception resulting in a Denial of Service. This could be sent to the ingress gateway or a sidecar, ...
CVE-2020-10136
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-02
Multiple products that implement the IP Encapsulation within IP standard (RFC 2003, STD 1) decapsulate and route IP-in-IP traffic without any validation, which could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to route arbitrary traffic via an exposed network interface and lead to spoofing, access cont...
CVE-2020-13757
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-01
Python-RSA 4.0 ignores leading '\0' bytes during decryption of ciphertext. This could conceivably have a security-relevant impact, e.g., by helping an attacker to infer that an application uses Python-RSA, or if the length of accepted ciphertext affects application behavior (such as by causing exces...