Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Security Management

5/21/2018
08:05 AM
Jeffrey Burt
Jeffrey Burt
Jeffrey Burt
50%
50%

Check Point: Cryptomining Malware Targeting Vulnerable Servers

As the incidence of ransomware wanes, attackers are shifting to cryptocurrency mining malware as a less noisy, more lucrative alternative, according to a new Check Point study.

Cryptomining in some ways has become the new ransomware, the latest focus for cyber attackers looking to make money by infiltrating users' computers, according to researchers at Check Point Software.

In the security company's latest Global Threat Index for April, researchers wrote that the activity around cryptomining malware has shot up since the end of 2017 and into the first four months of this year, most recently with attackers increasingly targeting unpatched vulnerabilities Microsoft and Oracle servers. It's part of a larger shift of cybercriminals trending away from ransomware to find another way to make money, according to Omer Dembinsky, data research team leader for Check Point's Threat Intelligence Group.

The incidence of ransomware in recent months has waned somewhat, although the malware is still a threat.

It took off a year ago with the emergence of the WannaCry worm, which in turn led to other ransomware malware like NotPetya, BadRabbit and Olympic Destroyer. However, ransomware is highly disruptive and noisy -- once it's in the machine, the user knows it's there -- and it usually required action on the user's part, including creating a Bitcoin account and then paying the ransom, Dembinsky told Security Now. (See WannaCry: How the Notorious Worm Changed Ransomware.)

"Cryptomining is a very lucrative path for that because it's basically very silent in the background," he said. "Users might not notice it, although it is something that can slow the computer down [and] it can hurt the applications running, but basically [it] can run uninterrupted by the user, can be there more persistently over a long time, so that's probably what led it to being a leading vector for attack. And the threat actors don't need a lot of knowledge in building sophisticated malware. They just put in a short part of code, they just run a small script, and that's it." (See Cryptocurrency Theft Uses Old Exploit to Highjack AWS Traffic.)

Cryptomining increasing
April was the fourth consecutive month where cryptomining malware dominated Check Point's list of the top malware threats, claiming the top spots. At number one was Coinhive, used to mine Monero cryptocurrency, while Cryptoloot was second. According to Check Point, the malware leverages a system's CPU or GPU power and other resources to add transactions to the blockchain and release new currency. Coinhive had a 16% global reach; Cryptoloot at a 14% reach.

In a blog post in March, Symantec's Security Response Team noted that detections of cryptocurrency coin mining began to skyrocket in September 2017, from well below 100,000 detections that month to more than 170,000 detections in December.

"Cyber criminals use coinminers to steal victims' computer processing power and cloud CPU usage to mine cryptocurrencies," the Symantec team wrote. "The barrier to entry for coin mining is pretty low -- potentially only requiring a couple of lines of code to operate -- and coin mining can allow criminals to lay under the radar in a way that is not possible with other types of cyber crime."

It's why attackers are now looking for server vulnerabilities to exploit, Check Point's Dembinsky said.

In April, the security firm saw a significant jump in cybercriminals targeting vulnerabilities in servers running Windows Server 2003 and Oracle Web Logic. Patches from Microsoft and Oracle have been available for at least six months, but threat actors continue to look for servers they can get into. According to Check Point, cybercriminals targeted 46% of organizations worldwide for the Windows Server 2013 vulnerability, while 40% of such organizations were targeted for the Web Logic vulnerability.

"What we've been seeing is basically they're trying to find any available CPUs or computers to run on," Dembinsky said. "Personal computers and corporate computers and mobile phones [have been targeted in the past] and, of course, servers have even much larger CPU and computing resources. That's very helpful for what they need. They can run much more on it. It's not necessarily something that's new, but it's one vector they're trying to exploit much more heavily."

Need for patching
Given the success attackers have had with cryptomining, it's likely the trend will continue for a while. Users won't always know when the malware is running on their systems, and that enables it to run for longer periods of time than noisier attacks like ransomware. That said, eventually something new will arise that will be a new popular avenue for cybercriminals, he said.

The attacks on the unpatched vulnerabilities of some Windows and Oracle servers highlights the need for organizations to be vigilant in keeping up-to-date with patching. Dembinsky pointed to WannaCry as an example, noting that its initial point of entry into systems as through a vulnerability that Microsoft had patched months earlier.

Protecting servers from cryptomining malware by patching the systems also is critical.

"We're talking about a big wave of trying to find servers that weren't patched," Dembinsky said. "So [attackers are] going out at about half of the networks in the world, and then once the criminals are able to find 1% or 2% that weren't patched, that still leaves them with thousands and thousands of networks, and inside each network, you can find thousands and thousands of machines and computers, so that is a lot of work that they can utilize to their goals."

Related posts:

— Jeffrey Burt is a long-time tech journalist whose work has appeared in such publications as eWEEK, The Next Platform and Channelnomics.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
News
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
News
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-27132
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
SerComm AG Combo VD625 AGSOT_2.1.0 devices allow CRLF injection (for HTTP header injection) in the download function via the Content-Disposition header.
CVE-2021-25284
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
An issue was discovered in through SaltStack Salt before 3002.5. salt.modules.cmdmod can log credentials to the info or error log level.
CVE-2021-3144
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
In SaltStack Salt before 3002.5, eauth tokens can be used once after expiration. (They might be used to run command against the salt master or minions.)
CVE-2021-3148
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
An issue was discovered in SaltStack Salt before 3002.5. Sending crafted web requests to the Salt API can result in salt.utils.thin.gen_thin() command injection because of different handling of single versus double quotes. This is related to salt/utils/thin.py.
CVE-2021-3151
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
i-doit before 1.16.0 is affected by Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) issues that could allow remote authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via C__MONITORING__CONFIG__TITLE, SM2__C__MONITORING__CONFIG__TITLE, C__MONITORING__CONFIG__PATH, SM2__C__MONITORING__CONFIG__PATH, C__M...