Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Risk

Study: 96 Percent Of Applications Have Security Vulnerabilities

Nearly all applications tested have security flaws, Cenzic study says; information leakage is chief culprit

Enterprises and software developers are starting to get control of old vulnerabilities such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting, according to a study published this week. But new vulnerabilities are taking their place, leaving flaws in nearly every application tested.

Ninety-six percent of applications tested have at least one security vulnerability, according to a study published by application security firm Cenzic earlier this week. This figure has dropped slightly -- the same study turned up flaws in 99% of apps in 2011 and 1012 -- but the vulnerabilities remain nearly ubiquitous.

In fact, the median number of vulnerabilities per application found in this year's study – 14 – is actually greater than it was in the previous year – 13.

"While some improvements in the development process have been made, other newer areas of vulnerability have emerged," says Bala Venkat, chief marketing officer at Cenzic, which compiled the numbers through an analysis of production applications scanned by its tools. "It's a graphic illustration of the gigantic game of whack-a-mole that enterprises and software developers are playing – and a clear message that it's time to rethink the way we develop and test our applications."

Information leakage -- in which an application exposes information about itself, its connections, or its users -- was the primary category of vulnerability in this year's study, accounting for almost one quarter (23 percent) of security flaws. This category displaced older vulnerabilities such as cross-site scripting (XSS), which still is found in almost as many applications.

"We found that the growth of mobile and cloud applications is causing a slight shift in the types of vulnerabilities we are finding," Venkat says. "But the prevalence of vulnerabilities has not changed significantly."

Enterprises and their software development teams need to rethink their processes, Venkat says, focusing more attention on security during the development cycle.

"Web application firewalls can also help enterprises identify vulnerabilities early and prevent them from leading to greater damage," Venkat says. Closer attention to basic issues such as server configuration can also help enterprises to minimize the impact of vulnerabilities in their applications, he adds.

"One of the chief obstacles that remain is to get software developers and enterprises to stop thinking of vulnerability scanning as a one-time project," Venkat stated. "As web applications evolve and make their journey traversing various production environments, the incidence of vulnerabilities is growing, not shrinking. Applications development and security teams must get together and implement a plan for continuous proactive monitoring of vulnerabilities, rather than the traditional, annual quality assessment."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add a Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
shjacks55
50%
50%
shjacks55,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/7/2014 | 7:25:00 AM
re: Study: 96 Percent Of Applications Have Security Vulnerabilities
You must be an old 68000 Mac guy. Or an ARM fanboy. Intel processors have had 4 security rings since 386 and S/390 had more (VM/CMS). Took a speed hit to write good code (no speed hit with newer CPUs but bad habits die hard). Intel depreciated then removed the Bounds instruction (limits buffer overflow) because it 'slowed down code' and stalled the pipeline. Lazy programmers for hardware vendors still write user mode drivers for hardware networking devices. (Bad when network gets busy.)
Linux is by no means perfect; programs like Flash run in Kernel and crash my Linux boxes. Mac (on BSD base OS) keeps less in the kernel mode and is more stable than Linux.
The largest US Retailers use Java POS S/W running on SUSE Linux. Older, exploit vulnerable Java. But these POS only talk to the Store Server which only talks to the Corporate Data Center: like Target's System.
macker490
50%
50%
macker490,
User Rank: Ninja
2/25/2014 | 1:26:15 PM
re: Study: 96 Percent Of Applications Have Security Vulnerabilities
errors in app programs are normal. this is why computers have kernel mode and user mode. it's been that way since 1964 when System/360 announced "multi-programming".

there are only 2 rules to computer security:
1. the o/s must not permit any un-authorized updates to itself.
2. the system owner/operator must be able to regulate what an application program or user is allowed to do.

the later was introduced to system 360 with RACF: 1974 these rules are also operational in Unix/Linux systems.

product liability: the o/s builder is responsible for making sure the tools (1, & 2, above) are effective. the system owner/operator is responsible for applying the rules.
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/1/2020
Ripple20 Threatens Increasingly Connected Medical Devices
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/30/2020
DDoS Attacks Jump 542% from Q4 2019 to Q1 2020
Dark Reading Staff 6/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The Threat from the Internet--and What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15478
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-01
The Journal theme before 3.1.0 for OpenCart allows exposure of sensitive data via SQL errors.
CVE-2020-6261
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-01
SAP Solution Manager (Trace Analysis), version 7.20, allows an attacker to perform a log injection into the trace file, due to Incomplete XML Validation. The readability of the trace file is impaired.
CVE-2020-15471
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-01
In nDPI through 3.2, the packet parsing code is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer over-read in ndpi_parse_packet_line_info in lib/ndpi_main.c.
CVE-2020-15472
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-01
In nDPI through 3.2, the H.323 dissector is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer over-read in ndpi_search_h323 in lib/protocols/h323.c, as demonstrated by a payload packet length that is too short.
CVE-2020-15473
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-01
In nDPI through 3.2, the OpenVPN dissector is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer over-read in ndpi_search_openvpn in lib/protocols/openvpn.c.