Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

News & Commentary

3/17/2015
11:30 AM
Cricket Liu
Cricket Liu
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

The End of Pen Testing As We Know It?

It's time to expand the scope of penetration tests beyond the periphery of the enterprise network.

As attack surfaces expand exponentially, security professionals need to broaden their focus beyond just stopping attackers, to finding malware inside their organizations and preventing data from leaving their networks. Analyst firm Gartner's report on 2015 tech trends predicts that digital businesses will find it impossible to maintain a 100% secured environment and will need to opt for risk assessment and mitigation tools instead.

“The old approach to security that emphasizes securing access is inadequate for digital business,” the report notes. “Security must be enhanced inside the enterprise boundaries and inside the applications themselves.”

Security teams have traditionally turned to penetration testing to perform mock attacks on computer systems in order to locate vulnerabilities that could be exploited. Entry points can occur on any externally facing part of the network including web servers, email servers, and firewalls. The practice has been effective but is dated, coming into existence in the 1960s and 1970s, when defense contractors and US defense agencies began the practice of systematically simulating attacks on the Pentagon's network, among other targets.

In 2015, with the rise of the Internet of Things and the continuing impact of Bring Your Own Device (BYOD), the number of entry points to networks has grown exponentially in size and complexity. Policing the periphery of the network is no longer enough:  It’s a foregone conclusion that infected devices—perhaps infected on another network, but infected nonetheless—will connect to what used to be thought of as the secure side of most networks.

The nature of attacks has changed as well. Cyberattacks were once a way of gaining notoriety in the hacker community, with attacks that were noisy and boastful in nature. Now, whether attackers are motivated by monetary gain or political interest, the nature of attacks has become less visible and more sophisticated. For example, advanced persistent threats (APTs) are common now. APTs invisibly infiltrate the network, lie undetected, and then communicate with offsite command-and-control centers to subversively operate on the network.

What next?

These days, most security professionals would concede that their networks have become more vulnerable, particularly with the rise of mobile device connections. Given the likelihood that attacks have already infiltrated the network, what’s next?

In addition to the network’s perimeter, security professionals need to focus on points where communication leaves the network and expand the scope of penetration testing to include the possibility—perhaps the inevitability—that compromised devices are connected to the network. Often, this external communication is via the Domain Name System, or DNS. APTs often use DNS to call home and receive instructions, at which point they may download additional malware payloads and steal sensitive information—possibly tunneled through DNS.

[Find out 5 Ways To Monitor DNS Traffic For Security Threats.]

By monitoring DNS traffic, looking both for known malicious destinations as well as suspicious traffic patterns, and disrupting this communication, companies can prevent valuable business and personal information from leaving the network. If an APT is prevented from “calling home,” it loses its potency. It may lie on the network for months undetected, but without a connection to the outside world, the damage it can do is very limited. This way, no matter how large the perimeter of a network grows, security teams can effectively manage key points of communication—including DNS—to render APTs ineffective.

 

Cricket Liu is a leading expert on the Domain Name System (DNS) and EVP and Senior Fellow at Infoblox. With more than 25 years of experience with enterprise-scale DNS infrastructure, technical writing, training, and course development experience, Cricket serves as a liaison ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
PZav
50%
50%
PZav,
User Rank: Author
3/17/2015 | 1:05:41 PM
Is that enough?
Great post, solid points. The question I have is where does the network peremiter end? Is it phyiscal hardware owned by IT and physical devices owned by employees or is there more to it? What about IaaS, website services like jQuery, analtics/tracking, ad networks...how do you go about pen testing all that?

 
Aviation Faces Increasing Cybersecurity Scrutiny
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  8/22/2019
Microsoft Tops Phishers' Favorite Brands as Facebook Spikes
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/22/2019
Capital One Breach: What Security Teams Can Do Now
Dr. Richard Gold, Head of Security Engineering at Digital Shadows,  8/23/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-15540
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-25
filters/filter-cso/filter-stream.c in the CSO filter in libMirage 3.2.2 in CDemu does not validate the part size, triggering a heap-based buffer overflow that can lead to root access by a local Linux user.
CVE-2019-15538
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-25
An issue was discovered in xfs_setattr_nonsize in fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c in the Linux kernel through 5.2.9. XFS partially wedges when a chgrp fails on account of being out of disk quota. xfs_setattr_nonsize is failing to unlock the ILOCK after the xfs_qm_vop_chown_reserve call fails. This is primarily a ...
CVE-2016-6154
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-23
The authentication applet in Watchguard Fireware 11.11 Operating System has reflected XSS (this can also cause an open redirect).
CVE-2019-5594
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-23
An Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") in Fortinet FortiNAC 8.3.0 to 8.3.6 and 8.5.0 admin webUI may allow an unauthenticated attacker to perform a reflected XSS attack via the search field in the webUI.
CVE-2019-6695
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-23
Lack of root file system integrity checking in Fortinet FortiManager VM application images of all versions below 6.2.1 may allow an attacker to implant third-party programs by recreating the image through specific methods.