Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Threat Intelligence

6/6/2019
02:00 PM
Kelly Sheridan
Kelly Sheridan
Slideshows
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail

6 Security Scams Set to Sweep This Summer

Experts share the cybersecurity threats to watch for and advice to stay protected.
2 of 7

Travel Security: Confidence Is Higher Than Deserved
In research released late last month, IBM discovered a disconnect between survey respondents' confidence in their security practices and their actual security habits while on the road. One-quarter say they are 'very' or 'extremely' confident in their abilities to protect themselves from cybercrime while traveling; 37% say they're 'somewhat' confident. Only 16% and 9% say they're 'a little' or 'not at all' confident, respectively.
But when asked about their travel habits, 24% of these confident respondents admit to connecting to public Wi-Fi networks every time they travel on business; 22% do the same on all personal trips. More than 25% bring and use a device containing confidential or sensitive work-related data when they travel for work; 16% do the same when traveling for pleasure. Nearly 20% of seemingly security-savvy travelers charge devices via public USB ports or charging stations when traveling for business; 17% do the same when they're on vacation.
More than 70% of Americans have engaged in a higher-risk travel behavior - connecting to public Wi-Fi, for example, or charging on a public USB station - regardless of whether they're traveling for business or pleasure. Charles Henderson, global managing partner at IBM and head of X-Force Red, points to another trend: 'Very often, consumers treat work information differently than they treat personal information,' he says. 
In addition, people are more likely to protect their own data than corporate trade secrets, a common issue faced by CISOs, he says. It is worth noting respondents travel far more frequently for personal than business reasons. Only 26% report traveling for work, while 84% say they primarily travel for personal reasons.
(Image: Georgejmclittle - stock.adobe.com)

Travel Security: Confidence Is Higher Than Deserved

In research released late last month, IBM discovered a disconnect between survey respondents' confidence in their security practices and their actual security habits while on the road. One-quarter say they are "very" or "extremely" confident in their abilities to protect themselves from cybercrime while traveling; 37% say they're "somewhat" confident. Only 16% and 9% say they're "a little" or "not at all" confident, respectively.

But when asked about their travel habits, 24% of these confident respondents admit to connecting to public Wi-Fi networks every time they travel on business; 22% do the same on all personal trips. More than 25% bring and use a device containing confidential or sensitive work-related data when they travel for work; 16% do the same when traveling for pleasure. Nearly 20% of seemingly security-savvy travelers charge devices via public USB ports or charging stations when traveling for business; 17% do the same when they're on vacation.

More than 70% of Americans have engaged in a higher-risk travel behavior connecting to public Wi-Fi, for example, or charging on a public USB station regardless of whether they're traveling for business or pleasure. Charles Henderson, global managing partner at IBM and head of X-Force Red, points to another trend: "Very often, consumers treat work information differently than they treat personal information," he says.

In addition, people are more likely to protect their own data than corporate trade secrets, a common issue faced by CISOs, he says. It is worth noting respondents travel far more frequently for personal than business reasons. Only 26% report traveling for work, while 84% say they primarily travel for personal reasons.

(Image: Georgejmclittle stock.adobe.com)

2 of 7
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Data Privacy Protections for the Most Vulnerable -- Children
Dimitri Sirota, Founder & CEO of BigID,  10/17/2019
Sodinokibi Ransomware: Where Attackers' Money Goes
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  10/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
2019 Online Malware and Threats
2019 Online Malware and Threats
As cyberattacks become more frequent and more sophisticated, enterprise security teams are under unprecedented pressure to respond. Is your organization ready?
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-18217
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-21
ProFTPD before 1.3.6b and 1.3.7rc before 1.3.7rc2 allows remote unauthenticated denial-of-service due to incorrect handling of overly long commands because main.c in a child process enters an infinite loop.
CVE-2019-16862
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-21
Reflected XSS in interface/forms/eye_mag/view.php in OpenEMR 5.x before 5.0.2.1 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of a user's session via the pid parameter.
CVE-2019-17409
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-21
Reflected XSS exists in interface/forms/eye_mag/view.php in OpenEMR 5.x before 5.0.2.1 ia the id parameter.
CVE-2019-10715
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-21
There is Stored XSS in Verodin Director before 3.5.4.0 via input fields of certain tooltips, and on the Tags, Sequences, and Actors pages.
CVE-2019-10716
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-21
An Information Disclosure issue in Verodin Director 3.5.3.1 and earlier reveals usernames and passwords of integrated security technologies via a /integrations.json JSON REST API request.