Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

5/17/2006
06:15 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

VPN Users Get Spike Protection

Aventail's on-demand licensing expected to ease disaster recovery woes

In volleyball, spikes are a good thing; in prison breaks and network management, not so much.

To help enterprises handle the inevitable spikes in traffic, VPN gateway vendor Aventail introduced today its Spike License Pack, which allows customers to buy short-duration licenses that can be activated during emergency or peak periods. Organizations can buy 30- and 90-day licenses.

And if your company is activating the license, you're most likely in emergency mode; therefore, Aventail is including its Platinum Assurance 24x7 customer service to try to resolve any problems quickly.

Aventail says companies will use Spike License Pack for two reasons: Peak-access periods like retail holidays or financial season deadlines; and for disaster recovery, where large numbers of users may need to access resources at a cold or hot backup site.

Experts point out that customers will often negotiate private arrangements with vendors for on-demand, short-term licenses. But the drawbacks are that licenses expire or don't get activated quickly enough to help.

"Many companies operate remote-access systems near capacity to save money, but doing so is a bad idea for disaster preparedness," writes John Girard, VP at the Gartner consultancy, in a research note. "All remote-access gateways should be designed with spare capacity, not only for emergencies, but also for better overall performance. If your remote-access program doesn't run like a well-oiled machine under normal circumstances, then it has no chance of weathering an emergency."

The Spike License Pack is available only on two of Aventail's VPN appliances -- the EX-1500, which supports 25 to 50 extra users; and the EX-2500, supporting 100 to 2,000 extra users. The EX-750 with its 25-user capacity, doesn't scale high enough to warrant a Spike License Pack offering.

The new licensing is unusual in the SSL VPN access space where many products are licensed on a per-device basis and not on a per-user basis. However, the cost savings for Aventail customers can be huge. For example, on an EX-1500 appliance licensed for 100 users with a 150-user Spike License Pack, the list prices are:

  • 30-day duration at $1,488 for a single appliance or high-availability pair, or

  • 90-day duration at $3,719 for a single appliance or HA pair.

The savings are sizeable when compared to a permanent upgrade of 150 additional users at $11,000 for a single appliance, or $17,600 for an HA pair. In addition, consider that Aventail's per-user pricing for 150 permanent licenses on a single appliance is roughly $73 per user, which, according to market research, is slightly below industry averages. The 30- and 90-day licenses are $9.92 per user and $24.79 per user, respectively.

— Mike Fratto, Editor at Large, Dark Reading

Organizations mentioned in this story

  • Aventail Corp.
  • Gartner Inc.

    Mike Fratto is a principal analyst at Current Analysis, covering the Enterprise Networking and Data Center Technology markets. Prior to that, Mike was with UBM Tech for 15 years, and served as editor of Network Computing. He was also lead analyst for InformationWeek Analytics ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    News
    Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
    Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
    Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
    Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
    Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
    News
    Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
    Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon Contest
    Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
    Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
    Current Issue
    2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
    We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
    Flash Poll
    Building the SOC of the Future
    Building the SOC of the Future
    Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2021-25284
    PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
    An issue was discovered in through SaltStack Salt before 3002.5. salt.modules.cmdmod can log credentials to the info or error log level.
    CVE-2021-3144
    PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
    In SaltStack Salt before 3002.5, eauth tokens can be used once after expiration. (They might be used to run command against the salt master or minions.)
    CVE-2021-3148
    PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
    An issue was discovered in SaltStack Salt before 3002.5. Sending crafted web requests to the Salt API can result in salt.utils.thin.gen_thin() command injection because of different handling of single versus double quotes. This is related to salt/utils/thin.py.
    CVE-2021-3151
    PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
    i-doit before 1.16.0 is affected by Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) issues that could allow remote authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via C__MONITORING__CONFIG__TITLE, SM2__C__MONITORING__CONFIG__TITLE, C__MONITORING__CONFIG__PATH, SM2__C__MONITORING__CONFIG__PATH, C__M...
    CVE-2021-3197
    PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
    An issue was discovered in SaltStack Salt before 3002.5. The salt-api's ssh client is vulnerable to a shell injection by including ProxyCommand in an argument, or via ssh_options provided in an API request.