Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

7/19/2013
05:26 PM
Mike Rothman
Mike Rothman
Commentary
50%
50%

APIs Giveth And APIs Taketh Away

Despite the incredible power afforded by APIs exposing cloud, mobile and Web services, there is a downside. There always is

Like many developers, I've had a long and tattered history with application programing interfaces (APIs). Back when I started my career (yes, in the Stone Age), I was a programmer on a 200-person team building telecom billing systems. I wrote screens that had to interface with the core foundation services of the billing platform via (you guessed it) an API.

I didn't last long in that job because it took me three days to troubleshoot an issue in the platform that broke my screen. Good times.

But APIs have become prevalent as development organizations move to build more modular and agile software. Many of these APIs expose key functionality in an open manner, not just within a self-contained environment using proprietary application calls like in the good old days. Rather, these APIs provide services available over the Internet to anyone authorized to use them. If I needed to add a real-time address parser to my billing address screen (which I had to do) back in the day, then I built it myself. And when we had to update the screen to support Canadian addresses, well, that was just miserable. I mean, who puts letters in their postal codes? Now I would just do a call to the U.S. (or Canadian) Postal Service's Web service and get the normalized address with the postal code. If it took an hour to code that, it's only because I was a crappy developer.

My partner Rich Mogull has been doing a lot of research about the management plane of the cloud and how even though everyone gets all excited about its elasticity, it's really the automation and orchestration afforded by cloud computing that will have the greatest impact on how we do security moving forward. In a recent post, he showed how about 50 lines of Ruby code can be used to identify unmanaged cloud instances in your account. It's very cool stuff. And it's all done through the APIs of Amazon Web Services.

Damn, those APIs again. It turns out APIs can do pretty much anything from a management context in the cloud. That provides these incredibly powerful software-defined security capabilities. But it also opens up your management plane to pretty much ... anyone. The APIs are accessible via the public Internet. If an attacker make an API call impersonating you, then they can do a lot of damage in your environment. Can you see your threat modeling team's collective heads exploding?

Thus, figuring out what vulnerabilities exist within your APIs is going to be a key part of managing threats of these cloud (and hybrid cloud) environments moving forward. Sure, traditional attacks will continue. But if an attacker could just spin up an instance using their malicious operating system in your cloud network, they don't have to worry about lateral movement to their target -- they are already there.

So there is an emerging category of technologies looking to protect the APIs against threats. These new "API gateways" are built to enable broader (and more secure) IT services accessibility as cloud and mobile applications provide broader and more open access to corporate IT data. As my partners Adrian Lane and Gunnar Peterson said in a recent blog series on API gateways: "API gateways curate APIs, provision access to users and developers, and facilitate key management. For security this is the place to focus – to centralize policy enforcement, implement enterprise protocols and standards, and manage the attack surface."

You may not be overly concerned with APIs today, nor will we see a lot of research at Black Hat this year breaking cloud APIs, but it's only a matter of time. When the attackers start to figure out what exactly they can do via the APIs, they will.

Mike Rothman is President of Securosis and author of "The Pragmatic CSO"

Mike's bold perspectives and irreverent style are invaluable as companies determine effective strategies to grapple with the dynamic security threatscape. Mike specializes in the sexy aspects of security, like protecting networks and endpoints, security management, and ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Mobile Banking Malware Up 50% in First Half of 2019
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/17/2020
Active Directory Needs an Update: Here's Why
Raz Rafaeli, CEO and Co-Founder at Secret Double Octopus,  1/16/2020
New Attack Campaigns Suggest Emotet Threat Is Far From Over
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  1/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-20399
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-23
A timing vulnerability in the Scalar::check_overflow function in Parity libsecp256k1-rs before 0.3.1 potentially allows an attacker to leak information via a side-channel attack.
CVE-2020-7915
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An issue was discovered on Eaton 5P 850 devices. The Ubicacion SAI field allows XSS attacks by an administrator.
CVE-2019-20391
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An invalid memory access flaw is present in libyang before v1.0-r3 in the function resolve_feature_value() when an if-feature statement is used inside a bit. Applications that use libyang to parse untrusted input yang files may crash.
CVE-2019-20392
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
An invalid memory access flaw is present in libyang before v1.0-r1 in the function resolve_feature_value() when an if-feature statement is used inside a list key node, and the feature used is not defined. Applications that use libyang to parse untrusted input yang files may crash.
CVE-2019-20393
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-22
A double-free is present in libyang before v1.0-r1 in the function yyparse() when an empty description is used. Applications that use libyang to parse untrusted input yang files may be vulnerable to this flaw, which would cause a crash or potentially code execution.