Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

4/12/2019
04:10 PM
50%
50%

CERT, CISA Warn of Vuln in at Least 4 Major VPNs

VPN products by Cisco, Palo Alto Networks, F5 Networks, Pulse Secure, insecurely store session cookies.

At least four major VPN vendors could be enabling attackers to do the very thing VPNs are made to protect against. 

The US-CERT Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency issued a warning today after CERT Coordination Center reported that multiple VPN vendors store authentication and/or session cookies insecurely in memory and/or log files.

"If an attacker has persistent access to a VPN user's endpoint or exfiltrates the cookie using other methods, they can replay the session and bypass other authentication methods," the CERT advisory states. "An attacker would then have access to the same applications that the user does through their VPN session."

CERT confirmed that Cisco, Palo Alto Networks, F5 Networks, and Pulse Secure products are affected by this vulnerability. However, the issue is repaired in the latest versions of Palo Alto's products and partly fixed in F5's.  

Pulse Secure issued this statement Friday night:

Pulse was notified by the CERT Coordination Center with regards to a vulnerability. This vulnerability affects older versions of Pulse Secure Desktop and Network Connect clients. However, Pulse Secure had already fixed this vulnerability in the latest Pulse Desktop Client and Network Connect product. Pulse issued a related Security Advisory to disclose this to the public - Security Advisory – SA44114.

Checkpoint and pfSense are unaffected. Status is unknown for over 200 other vendors.

For more information, see here

 

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RyanSepe
100%
0%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
4/15/2019 | 9:10:01 AM
exfiltrates the cookie using other methods
"exfiltrates the cookie using other methods" I would deem the most probable. In my eyes if I know where the cookie is stored just using a dropper to send the cookie home would give enough time for the replay. Especially when timeouts can be 8 hours or more for the session.
The Security of Cloud Applications
Hillel Solow, CTO and Co-founder, Protego,  7/11/2019
Where Businesses Waste Endpoint Security Budgets
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-13643
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-18
Stored XSS in EspoCRM before 5.6.4 allows remote attackers to execute malicious JavaScript and inject arbitrary source code into the target pages. The attack begins by storing a new stream message containing an XSS payload. The stored payload can then be triggered by clicking a malicious link on the...
CVE-2019-13644
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-18
Firefly III before 4.7.17.1 is vulnerable to stored XSS due to lack of filtration of user-supplied data in a budget name. The JavaScript code is contained in a transaction, and is executed on the tags/show/$tag_number$ tag summary page.
CVE-2019-13645
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-18
Firefly III before 4.7.17.3 is vulnerable to stored XSS due to lack of filtration of user-supplied data in image file names. The JavaScript code is executed during attachments/edit/$file_id$ attachment editing.
CVE-2019-13646
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-18
Firefly III before 4.7.17.3 is vulnerable to reflected XSS due to lack of filtration of user-supplied data in a search query.
CVE-2019-13647
PUBLISHED: 2019-07-18
Firefly III before 4.7.17.3 is vulnerable to stored XSS due to lack of filtration of user-supplied data in image file content. The JavaScript code is executed during attachments/view/$file_id$ attachment viewing.