Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

6/15/2020
04:25 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Intel Tackles Malware Related to Memory Security at Hardware Level

New control-flow enforcement technology will become available with upcoming Tiger Lake mobile processor, chipmaker says.

Intel has announced new CPU-level capabilities designed to protect apps against threats that take advantage of buffer overflow and other common vulnerabilities related to memory security.

Intel's new control-flow enforcement technology (CET) will first become available with the chipmaker's upcoming Tiger Lake mobile processor and eventually be rolled out to other processor families.

Tom Garrison, vice president of Intel's client computing group, says CET protects against what are known as control-flow hijacking attacks, a technique used by many malware classes. He describes these as attacks that manipulate the manner in which a written piece of code operates in order to trigger a very different outcome from what was originally intended.

"The analogy I like to use is the word "there,'" Garrison says. "We know what it means. But if you choose to ignore the first letter, you get 'here,' which has a very different meaning." Similarly, dropping every second letter in the word "there" would result in "tee," which again has a very different meaning from the original, he says.

In control-flow attacks, adversaries manipulate code in a similar way to achieve malicious outcomes, he says. But because they are using code that is supposed to be safe, their tampering is not readily detectable by software. "CET solves a class of attacks that has been plaguing the industry for sometime," he says.

At a high level, CET uses two techniques to prevent legitimate code from being used in control-flow attacks. One is called "indirect branch tracking" and the other is "shadow stack." According to Garrison, the indirect tracking capability ensures that when code is executing and needs to jump to a new area of code, it only lands on a so-called end branch, or the area in the code where it is supposed to land.  

"Think about it like a pond with lily pads on it," he says. "If you are a frog, you can jump from lily pad to lily pad because that is where you are supposed to land." If it jumps to where there is no lily pad, the error would be immediately detected and flagged, Garrison says.

Shadow stack is designed to address memory-security issues that allow attackers to hijack what are known as return addresses and point them to an attacker-defined address. Shadow stack keeps a copy of all return addresses so if an attacker manipulates an original return address, the change is immediately detected and flagged.

"These types of attack methods are part of a class of malware referred to as memory safety issues, and include tactics such as the corruption of stack buffer overflow and use-after-free," Garrison said in a blog announcing CET. More than 60% of the nearly 1,100 zero-day bugs listed by Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative since the beginning of 2019 fall into this category, he noted.

Working with Microsoft
Intel published a white paper with CET specifications back in 2016. Since then it has been working with Microsoft to ensure that Windows 10 and developer tools are ready to take advantage of CET when it becomes available with the Tiger Lake processor family.

Earlier this year, Microsoft outlined its support for Intel CET via a Windows 10 capability called "hardware-enforced stack protection." The feature works only on Intel chipsets that are compliant with CET specifications and is designed to alleviate concerns related to memory vulnerabilities.

In a blog, Microsoft described hardware-enforced stack protection as an option that developers can choose to use to implement hardware-level protections against control-flow attacks.

"We will provide ongoing guidance on how to re-build your application to be shadow stacks compliant," the company said. "This protection will be a major step forward in our continuous efforts to make Windows 10 one of the most secure operating system for our customers."

Related Content:

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Learn from industry experts in a setting that is conducive to interaction and conversation about how to prepare for that "really bad day" in cybersecurity. Click for more information and to register
Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15208
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, when determining the common dimension size of two tensors, TFLite uses a `DCHECK` which is no-op outside of debug compilation modes. Since the function always returns the dimension of the first tensor, malicious attackers can ...
CVE-2020-15209
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, a crafted TFLite model can force a node to have as input a tensor backed by a `nullptr` buffer. This can be achieved by changing a buffer index in the flatbuffer serialization to convert a read-only tensor to a read-write one....
CVE-2020-15210
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a TFLite saved model uses the same tensor as both input and output of an operator, then, depending on the operator, we can observe a segmentation fault or just memory corruption. We have patched the issue in d58c96946b and ...
CVE-2020-15211
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices f...
CVE-2020-15212
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, models using segment sum can trigger writes outside of bounds of heap allocated buffers by inserting negative elements in the segment ids tensor. Users having access to `segment_ids_data` can alter `output_index` and then write to outside of `outpu...