Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

4/18/2014
03:00 PM
Marilyn Cohodas
Marilyn Cohodas
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Poll: Dark Reading Community Acts On Heartbleed

Roughly 60 percent of respondents to our flash poll have installed the Heartbeat fix or are in the process of doing so.

It will be some time before the full impact of the Heartbleed bug will be known, but in the Dark Reading security community, members are not dragging their feet about remedial action, according to our recent online flash poll Broken Heartbeat.

The danger was perceived immediately. "If you can spoof the server and step in as if you were that server, from a malicious standpoint, there is no end to the data that will be compromised," RyanSepe observed in a comment on our breaking story, Emergency SSL/TLS Patching Under Way. In the days since, more than 260 of you have weighed in on the steps your companies are taking to prevent cyberspies and criminals from gaining access to personal data on servers, networks, and devices through the flawed OpenSSL "Heartbeat" function of TLS.

Our poll allowed respondents to choose as many of the five responses as applied to their mitigation strategy. Six out of 10 of our respondents report that they have already installed the Heartbeat fix on their servers or are in the process of doing so. Only about 40 percent said they are replacing digital certificates.

The issue of what to do about passwords was raised by many readers, both on a personal level and in relation to the need to safeguard others' personal data on corporate servers. "As a developer I find it appalling that companies are not instituting a password black list for the 100 most common passwords by now," wrote jaingverda on Emergency SSL/TLS Patching Under Way. Yet, in our poll, only 30 percent of respondents said their organizations are requiring end users to change their passwords.

Not surprisingly, fewer than 8 percent of respondents said they are doing nothing about Heartbleed. But I take with a grain of salt the 17 percent who checked "What's Heartbleed?" -- a tongue-in-cheek response we included to underscore the fact that we recognize the limits of our online poll; it's anecdotal information, not pure research.

That said, I hope we can flesh out these data points with more detail in ongoing discussions. To quote Ed Moyle in a comment titled "Tip of the iceberg IMHO:"

What really concerns me is less the population of web servers that this impacts -- because, impactful as that is, they can at least upgrade fairly easily. What really makes me nervous is what else is vulnerable that can't be upgraded quite so easily. This code is in a lot of stuff, in particular embedded systems. Mark my words -- we'll be dealing with this one for a while.

I couldn't agree more. Let's begin by chatting about what strategies have been effective for you so far and what challenges have you stumped. And, if you still want to add your two cents to the online poll, it's still live, so click here.

Marilyn has been covering technology for business, government, and consumer audiences for over 20 years. Prior to joining UBM, Marilyn worked for nine years as editorial director at TechTarget Inc., where she launched six Websites for IT managers and administrators supporting ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
4/21/2014 | 1:21:52 PM
Re: passwords -- in relation to the Heartbleed bug
Paul, In terms of our poll, do you think the fact that only 30 percent of respondents said their organizations are requiring end users to change their passwords, reflects a deeper problem -- that most organizations have given up on the idea that passwords are an effective end-users security strategy?
PaulS681
50%
50%
PaulS681,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/20/2014 | 6:50:04 PM
passwords

Passwords are the weak link to many things. How many people use that word for their password?  I bet it's a pretty large number. That being said what else can we do? Finger prints maybe? I realize that's much easier said than done.

 

Stop Defending Everything
Kevin Kurzawa, Senior Information Security Auditor,  2/12/2020
Small Business Security: 5 Tips on How and Where to Start
Mike Puglia, Chief Strategy Officer at Kaseya,  2/13/2020
Architectural Analysis IDs 78 Specific Risks in Machine-Learning Systems
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  2/13/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-1811
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-18
GaussDB 200 with version of 6.5.1 have a command injection vulnerability. Due to insufficient input validation, remote attackers with low permissions could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted commands to the affected device. Successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute commands.
CVE-2020-1815
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-18
Huawei NIP6800 versions V500R001C30, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00; Secospace USG6600 and USG9500 versions V500R001C30SPC200, V500R001C30SPC600, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00 have a memory leak vulnerability. The software does not sufficiently track and release allocated memory while parse...
CVE-2020-1816
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-18
Huawei NIP6800 versions V500R001C30, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00; Secospace USG6600 and USG9500 versions V500R001C30SPC200, V500R001C30SPC600, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00 have a Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability. Due to improper processing of specific IPSEC packets, remote attacker...
CVE-2020-1830
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-18
Huawei NIP6800 versions V500R001C30, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00; Secospace USG6600 and USG9500 versions V500R001C30SPC200, V500R001C30SPC600, V500R001C60SPC500, and V500R005C00 have a vulnerability that a memory management error exists when IPSec Module handing a specific message. This cause...
CVE-2020-1882
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-18
Huawei mobile phones Ever-L29B versions earlier than 10.0.0.180(C185E6R3P3), earlier than 10.0.0.180(C432E6R1P7), earlier than 10.0.0.180(C636E5R2P3); HUAWEI Mate 20 RS versions earlier than 10.0.0.175(C786E70R3P8); HUAWEI Mate 20 X versions earlier than 10.0.0.176(C00E70R2P8); and Honor Magic2 vers...