Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

3/20/2019
02:30 PM
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
100%
0%

The Insider Threat: It's More Common Than You Think

A new study shows why security teams must look holistically across cybersecurity, compliance, technology, and human resources to truly address the business effects of workforce risk.

Many companies take an "it will never happen here" mindset to insider threats because they believe they hire the best, most honest and trusted employees. That may be true in the beginning, after a bulletproof background screening done years ago. But later on, stress factors sometimes intrude in an individual's life such as a difficult divorce, a DUI, or some other type of arrest, bankruptcy, or lien.

Most of the time, these stressors are external and out of sight of the employer. In some cases, they lead employees to disrupt events internally, which puts organizations at risk, even if executives know nothing about the individual circumstances.

There are many recent examples of workforce problems that have negatively affected large corporations financially and in terms of their reputations:

  • A former Goodwill employee stole $93,000 from the charity by faking payroll records.
  • A rogue Tesla employee broke into the company's manufacturing operating system and sent highly sensitive data outside of the firm.
  • Uber's 60-person crisis team is dealing with 1,200 severe incidents reported to the company weekly, including verbal threats, physical and sexual assault, rape, theft, and serious traffic accidents.

The good news is that many security executives have begun to recognize the fallout from insider workforce risks. According to a recent Endera survey of 200 security executives, on average, companies with 1,000 employees or more experience at least three workforce-related incidents a week — that's 156 per year — which includes fraud, cybersecurity risks, workplace violence, and device theft or loss. Several key trends from this report also highlight the need for security executives to dig deeper and be more proactive.

A proactive workplace safety culture: The Endera report revealed that 88% of respondents agree that companies can proactively head off problems through effective policy enforcement and employee assistance programs to retain talent and ensure a motivated and safe workforce environment. Conversely, in the wake of a workforce-related security incident, almost 40% of respondents reported that employees lost confidence in the organization's ability to keep them safe.

Supply chain risks: A full 87% of security executives surveyed said independent contractors/freelancers are most likely to be the cause of workforce-related security incidents such as fraud and device theft at their company, and 64% reported that supply chain/third-party vendors were the most likely cause of these risks. The report went on to find that 71% of those contractors have face-to-face interactions with customers, including those who rely on the extension of the enterprise to provide daily services such as child care, transportation, healthcare, and more.

A broader, more holistic view of threats: A full 86% of respondents reported device theft or loss among their top three risks, followed by fraud (80%) and cybersecurity threats (74%). Three in 10 (31%) respondents cited cybersecurity incidents, including IP theft and data loss as the costliest internal or external security threat being experienced by their organization over the last 12 months. While cyber threats are clearly important, security executives need to consider physical workforce risks as well.

Negative business effects of workforce risks: The vast majority — 98% — of security executives reported that their organization has experienced negative business effects as a result of workforce-related incidents. For example, the survey found that:

  • 63% of respondents stated they experienced financial loss and loss of sensitive data.
  • 60% shared that customers' trust in the organization decreased and that the organization's reputation suffered.
  • 59% reported declining workforces' confidence in the organization's ability to keep them safe and that employees left the organization as a result of these incidences.

Pre- and post-employment screening: While three-quarters of all organizations surveyed conduct pre-employment screens 44% of the time, companies said they are not aware of potential workforce or personnel issues prior to an incident. Just under half (48%) of respondents said these employee screening checks are continued on a regular basis. Of those using internal data from data loss prevention tools, user activity monitoring, communications monitoring, or keystroke software to evaluate risk in their workforce, four in 10 respondents reported that the information isn't always available quickly enough, and 34% reported that the range of information isn't up to date and doesn't always cover all of the data, such as ongoing scanning of public criminal or civil records, ongoing sanctions, or license requirements needed to actively mitigate the risk. The majority of respondents reported that employee screenings, such as background checks or ongoing evaluation, happens on a less-frequent basis, with only 11% reporting that it happens monthly and only 2% of respondents reporting that their organization updates external background checks on an individual on a daily basis.

The ability to proactively evaluate, diagnose, and mitigate workforce risk by knowing and understanding all risk factors is critical. Security teams must move from a reactive to a proactive workforce risk management approach and look holistically across the entire enterprise including cybersecurity, compliance, technology, and human resources to truly address the business impacts of workforce risk.

Related Content:

 

 

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop 2019. Learn from the industry's most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the Interop agenda here.

Raj Ananthanpillai is the chairman and CEO of Endera. Previously, he was the CEO of InfoZen, a high-end cloud and DevOps IT services company which was successfully sold in 2017. Prior to this, he served as the chief strategy officer of ePlus, Inc. (NASDAQ: PLUS), a business ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
REISEN1955
0%
100%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
3/20/2019 | 3:41:15 PM
Let the employer value the employee
Hey - your job can be outrsourced in a moment after you train your replacement from India.  BTW he is less expensive than you are.  Hey, we would like 2 weeks notice if you decided to leave us but we can terminate you in a heartbeat for any damn reason we choose.  Hey, you made a mistake - too bad it goes on your record.   Hey, we want to move you to a tiny cube of a desk.  Hey, you were 2 minutes late last week.  Why?   Please see HR and fill out form 2012-B in triplicate.  You think this is funny???  Me not, I have seen some variations of these little jokes, some not so funny, over the years.  inside threats are often caused by things such as the above.  When a firm does not place value in employees, internal staff will reciprocate by not placing value in their employer.  Simple and easy way to have those laptop systems with data walk out of the building.  

Oh, wait - just checked to see if the free coffee still exists.  Yeap - it does ................ for now.

Added comment - 18 months agoi left a fair to rotten job.  Employer fired a few people on 1 day notice or zero day notice.  Phone call on one.  So they did not treat hard working staff with respect at all.  When I left, I could have given 2 weeks notice.   But my revenge was on them.  I was the critical IT staffer in one office so i was happy to show them the mirror image of their behavior too.  And that is why employees are disgruntled and prone to act back.   
For Cybersecurity to Be Proactive, Terrains Must Be Mapped
Craig Harber, Chief Technology Officer at Fidelis Cybersecurity,  10/8/2019
A Realistic Threat Model for the Masses
Lysa Myers, Security Researcher, ESET,  10/9/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
2019 Online Malware and Threats
2019 Online Malware and Threats
As cyberattacks become more frequent and more sophisticated, enterprise security teams are under unprecedented pressure to respond. Is your organization ready?
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-10759
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-15
safer-eval before 1.3.4 are vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Execution. A payload using constructor properties can escape the sandbox and execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2019-10760
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-15
safer-eval before 1.3.2 are vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Execution. A payload using constructor properties can escape the sandbox and execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2019-17397
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-15
In the DoorDash application through 11.5.2 for Android, the username and password are stored in the log during authentication, and may be available to attackers via logcat.
CVE-2019-12944
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-15
Glue Smart Lock 2.7.8 devices do not properly block guest access in certain situations where the network connection is unavailable.
CVE-2019-17195
PUBLISHED: 2019-10-15
Connect2id Nimbus JOSE+JWT before v7.9 can throw various uncaught exceptions while parsing a JWT, which could result in an application crash (potential information disclosure) or a potential authentication bypass.