Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

4/13/2012
02:12 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Firefox To Require Permission For Plug-Ins

Mozilla hopes to make Firefox more secure by having users opt in for plug-ins.

Mozilla engineers are in the process of improving the security and speed of Firefox by implementing a permission switch for browser plug-ins.

In a blog post on Wednesday, Mozilla software engineer Jared Wein said that browser plug-ins are often the cause of security problems and system slowdowns and that "click-to-play" code has been added to Firefox nightly developer builds to control the activation of plug-ins.

"When plugins.click_to_play is enabled, plug-ins will require an extra click to activate and start 'playing' content," Wein explains. "This is an incremental step towards securing our users, reducing memory usage, and opening up the Web."

[ Read about Amazon's cloud-based search service. See Amazon Returns To Search Business With CloudSearch. ]

It may also further erode the usage of plug-in technologies such as Adobe Flash on desktop computers. In a Twitter post, privacy researcher Christopher Soghoian notes that the move "essentially kills Flash ads and Flash cookie tracking."

The impact of this new Firefox feature will depend on how it is expressed in default settings and on the various use cases that Firefox engineers end up supporting. For example, the click-to-play feature may include options to allow users to avoid having to reauthorize plug-ins on popular sites like YouTube. Mozilla does not want to make Firefox so secure it's a hassle to use. However, such conveniences could undermine potential security and privacy benefits of requiring users to approve plug-in operation.

Google Chrome has for a while now included a similar permission mechanism for plug-ins, accessed via Settings/Under the Hood/Privacy-Content Settings/Plug-ins. But Chrome's engineers evidently believe that users will have a better experience without having to approve plug-ins: "Run automatically" is singled out as the "recommended" option.

Mozilla is also considering whether to let previously granted plug-in approval expire if the plug-in has not been used in the past 30 days.

Apple recently adopted this expiration date approach to deal with the Flashback trojan that has affected over 600,000 Macs. In its security update released on Thursday, Apple said, "As a security hardening measure, the Java browser plug-in and Java Web Start are deactivated if they are unused for 35 days."

"Click-to-play" for plug-ins is scheduled to arrive in Firefox 14.

When picking endpoint protection software, step one is to ask users what they think. Also in the new, all-digital Security Software: Listen Up! issue of InformationWeek: CIO Chad Fulgham gives us an exclusive look at the agency's new case management system, Sentinel; and a look at how LTE changes mobility. (Free registration required.)

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Bprince
50%
50%
Bprince,
User Rank: Ninja
4/14/2012 | 2:22:32 PM
re: Firefox To Require Permission For Plug-Ins
@readers: do you think this will have a positive impact on plugin security, and do you see it hurting the use of plugins overall?
Brian Prince, InformationWeek/Dark Reading Comment Moderator
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/17/2020
Cybersecurity Bounces Back, but Talent Still Absent
Simone Petrella, Chief Executive Officer, CyberVista,  9/16/2020
Meet the Computer Scientist Who Helped Push for Paper Ballots
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/16/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-25789
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-19
An issue was discovered in Tiny Tiny RSS (aka tt-rss) before 2020-09-16. The cached_url feature mishandles JavaScript inside an SVG document.
CVE-2020-25790
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-19
** DISPUTED ** Typesetter CMS 5.x through 5.1 allows admins to upload and execute arbitrary PHP code via a .php file inside a ZIP archive. NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this report because "admins are considered trustworthy"; however, the behavior "contradicts our secu...
CVE-2020-25791
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-19
An issue was discovered in the sized-chunks crate through 0.6.2 for Rust. In the Chunk implementation, the array size is not checked when constructed with unit().
CVE-2020-25792
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-19
An issue was discovered in the sized-chunks crate through 0.6.2 for Rust. In the Chunk implementation, the array size is not checked when constructed with pair().
CVE-2020-25793
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-19
An issue was discovered in the sized-chunks crate through 0.6.2 for Rust. In the Chunk implementation, the array size is not checked when constructed with From<InlineArray<A, T>>.