Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

6/14/2012
02:31 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Google, Facebook, Twitter, AOL Fight Badware

Tech giants, Internet Advertising Bureau, and StopBadware form the Ads Integrity Alliance to battle malicious advertising.

Google and Facebook may be cutthroat competitors but they share a common enemy: bad advertising. That's "bad" in the sense of harmful rather than ineffective or cringe-inducing. If enough Internet users start seeing online ads as a source of malware or as untrustworthy, they could take steps to block ads. That would be ruinous for revenue.

So it is that Google and Facebook, along with AOL, Twitter, and the Internet Advertising Bureau (IAB) on Thursday joined with StopBadware to announce the formation of the Ads Integrity Alliance, an industry partnership to fight bad advertising.

Bad advertising includes malvertising--malware delivered via ads--and ads that deceive or violate policies.

The Ads Integrity Alliance aims to serve three primary functions: developing and sharing industry best practices; coordinating information sharing about those attempting to abuse online ad systems; and sharing trend data with regulators and law enforcement agencies.

[ ICANN's plan to approve new domain names spurs competition for desirable suffixes. Read New Domain Names Tempt Amazon, Google, Microsoft. ]

If you listen, you may be able to hear echoes of past industry ad security initiatives. Google was among the Internet companies that backed the formation of StopBadware in 2006, along with Sun Microsystems and Lenovo. Back then, there was more concern about adware: downloadable applications--the term had not yet been shorted to "app"--that presented unwanted ads and sometimes stole information.

The group was also concerned about spyware, software that collects personal information without the user's consent. That was before companies figured out that they could collect personal information with user consent by burying information collection practices in lengthy "privacy policies" and making acceptance of those policies a requirement for service usage.

In 2009, Google launched a website called Anti-Malvertising.com, a custom search engine and website to help its ad network partners identify potential providers of malicious advertisements. It also maintains a Google Groups mailing list called the DoubleClick Anti-Malvertising Group that posts alerts about websites hosting malware and ad networks distributing malicious ads.

In 2008, Google security engineer Niels Provos said in a blog post that about 2% of malicious websites were distributing malware through advertising, based on an analysis of about 2,000 known advertising networks. The company declined to update that particular metric but did post vaguely related figures last month.

Google says it disabled over 134 million ads and the accounts of over 824,000 advertisers for policy violations in 2011--so only a small subset of these ads carried malware. This is up sharply from 2010, when Google disabled 54.7 million ads and 248,000 advertiser accounts.

Nonetheless, Google insists its efforts are working. David W. Baker, director of engineering for Google's advertising group, said in a blog post last month that Google reduced the percentage of bad ads shown in 2011 to half what it was in 2010.

StopBadware did not provide specific figures about the prevalence of bad ads, but a spokesperson for the group said, "We speak daily to owners and administrators of compromised websites, and in our experience bad ads are almost exclusively the cause of site compromise on well-regarded, high-traffic websites."

The Enterprise 2.0 Conference brings together industry thought leaders to explore the latest innovations in enterprise social software, analytics, and big data tools and technologies. Learn how your business can harness these tools to improve internal business processes and create operational efficiencies. It happens in Boston, June 18-21. Register today!

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Bprince
50%
50%
Bprince,
User Rank: Ninja
6/16/2012 | 1:55:06 PM
re: Google, Facebook, Twitter, AOL Fight Badware
Twitter just bought Dasient I believe in January along the same lines. @ readers - Have malicious advertisements changed your surfing habits on the Web in any way?
Brian Prince, InformationWeek/Dark Reading Comment Moderator
SOC 2s & Third-Party Assessments: How to Prevent Them from Being Used in a Data Breach Lawsuit
Beth Burgin Waller, Chair, Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Practice , Woods Rogers PLC,  12/5/2019
Navigating Security in the Cloud
Diya Jolly, Chief Product Officer, Okta,  12/4/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-4428
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
IBM Watson Assistant for IBM Cloud Pak for Data 1.0.0 through 1.3.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session....
CVE-2019-4611
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 168519.
CVE-2019-4612
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0 is vulnerable to malicious file upload in the My Account Portal. Attackers can make use of this weakness and upload malicious executable files into the system and it can be sent to victim for performing further attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 168523.
CVE-2019-4621
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
IBM DataPower Gateway 7.6.0.0-7 throug 6.0.14 and 2018.4.1.0 through 2018.4.1.5 have a default administrator account that is enabled if the IPMI LAN channel is enabled. A remote attacker could use this account to gain unauthorised access to the BMC. IBM X-Force ID: 168883.
CVE-2019-19230
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-09
An unsafe deserialization vulnerability exists in CA Release Automation (Nolio) 6.6 with the DataManagement component that can allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code.